[D-G] About a Sixth Republic...

[Mike Lansing]

Early morning before dawn, we heard the first ritournelle of a bird's
Code du Travail, degravity, and there are markers as to the bird's
health that can be detected. Three Ecologies, we must retrieve the study
for it seems to mesh with schizoanalysis.

Regarde, ML

<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
>Sent: 5/10/2017 8:27:53 PM
>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>Subject: Re: [D-G] About a Sixth Republic...
>
>2017-05-09 20:50 GMT+02:00 Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com>:
>
>> (...)
>>
>> One has to be more centrist than centrist (Deleuze) for new clinical
and
>> critical trajectories.
>>
>
>hi.
>this comes timely & handy for our group in Perpignan: after second
round,
>and Macron's election,
>the debate among us, runs about whether Macron is (only) a Centrist,
after
>all,
>and what happens if he does the reshape in the 'Code du Travail' : how
does
>that pledge
>alligns with the 'pragmatist' stance? --> need for psychotherapy and
>schizo-analyzis...
>
>we have thus read tonight at Municipalité, the plateau 'ritournelle'
read
>out loud, collectively, from ATP, the start with the distinction
>between 'milieu', 'chaos', and 'rhythm'.
>this to get to a better understanding of the world as it comes shaped
>around us.
>
>someone picked up with the notion of a 'qualitative mark', and made the
>observation
>that markers could either be qualitative (ie.sensation, like smell, or
>color, etc) either imperceptible:
>the imperceptible markers are part of the 'markers' group, and they are
>just as much important
>for the 'self-consciousness' and 'managment of emotions'.
>
>ATP define Territorialising Process by a marker signature (there is a
>subject: carrier
>or producer of signature, the Territory belongs to this subject). this
>within the context of
>chaos. (the subject could grow in importance within our theoretical
>tactics).
>there's also the notion of a 'measuring unity' gifted with
>variability. (Heccéité plays role in coordination of heterogenous
>space-time within ATP)
>that's where ATP makes a difference: the measuring unity operates in a
>confined milieu.
>it is in turn, distinct with transcoding of rhythm, between milieux.
they
>call this the distinction between 'dogma' and
>'criticism'. and third part, comes the Territoryalising Factor, and
that's
>the part where some in our group,
>want to introduce our notion of 'self-consciousness' and 'managment of
>emotions'.
>
>Alain Badiou, who says we should forget about the elections,
talks/writes
>about a duality he observes between capitalism
>and communism. the latter calls forth a 'collective forms of managment
of
>productive means, credit and exchanges' and 'end of separate state'.
>
>this comes timely talks about forthcoming privatization of the web.
>previous us. administration favored homogeneity, heterogeneity not, but
>now some AT&P and Verizon, would lobby for 'having more quality www.'
and
>for that there needs to be 'work done', and thus,
>investment, and thus the like of AT&P and Verizon. such goes the
arguments
>of other groups we saw yesterday on the web.
>
>so that's what our group was about to come up with, in terms of
horizon,
>context. in our discussions at the Municipalité, since the French
election.
>
>it seems that Earth/Land Priority, the Gravity factor comes in physical
>contact with the 'Code du Travail': if
>we record 'self-consciousness' as a De-Gravitation off : to be 'more
>centrist' than Macron. And considering,
>how hardly, did we become with markers to Territorialise 'credit' and
>'exchange': it seems they come,
>already written in the space-time milieu and the main problem seems to
be ,
>within our managment
>of emotions, and of 'opinions', to understand: how (are we wanting) to
>relate with our 'representation' of this milieu?
>-- for example: am i wanting to be ready to, with ease, change job, get
>fired, and have the option or not, to take a six month job, and trust
>the milieu, or the 'measuring unity', that i should, in such
circumstances
>find a (possibly repeating) match between this situation,
>and my 'self-consciousness' and its desire of a progressive evolution,
into
>that? is that yes or not Oedipian? OR
>-- should i instead want to be inscribed by the existing 'Code du
Travail',
>the ones warrants are offered by the Unions, to the quality of my
>self-consciousness in the milieu, as if within a protection, (> how
does
>this imply a
>protection of the milieu? the milieu would become protected by the
>'measuring unity'? which one? am I able to vote for or against it? )
>and sort of translate the conflict within the 'representative' level.
OR
>-- would I want the Inscribtion in my Life of the qualititative (&
>imperceptible) markers, of the likes of AT&T and Verizon, or at the
>contrary the 'collective forms of managments'
> to be expressive of the movements of 'self-consciousness' (whose?) and
>reflect, becoming of credit and exchange markers,
>variations in transcodage between existing self-consciousnesses,
'managment
>of emotions'? 'whose?' ATP recalls how the Spider integrates a fragment
of
>another Code 'as such': the Fly,
>in its web. that's a transcodage, or transcoding. yet, not yet what
>happens in a Territory, what happens in a next phase: with a Domain,
>
>with a Signature.
>
>So we are allowed: we ask ourselves, if we the system, we the people,
we
>the digital age, the electronic signatures, the models in 3d, the
templates
>that can be
>purchased or exchanged, how do they relate with Dimension, instead than
>with Direction. ? how does that relate with
>the 'Representative' level, which btw can stand as a neutral blocker
agent
>(cfr last post) on a fixating 'ressentment'.?
>so that the 'Representative' level, can we ask ourselves: how is it
>differing from the 'Measuring Unity' in the space-time? how exchangable
>is it with it? Don't we need to Integrate it, if we want to be
Centrists?
>Would an Anonymous Artificial Intelligence, dispatching in an Augmented
>Reality (carrier of qualitative
>and imperceptible marks in movements) : such A.I. becoming a Measuring
>Unity, in a digital milieu, become able to stand fully soon, as a
>'Representative' level. warranting "signature recognition exchanges"?
>this question seems now to be the basis of Deleuze distinction between
at
>least 3 Type of Societies: 'Feudal', 'Disciplinary' and 'Control'.
>How to protect my self-consciousness, within a context of various
movements
>of deterr. and reterr. (cfr.example the
writingbook/vinyl/architecture/-
>issues)
>emerging at the occasion of the transcodage between an organization and
>another. How to Inscribe Heterogeneity of Components
>within the Managment of our Self-Consciousness? (in defense of our Mind
-
>Clarity to the nextofkin.)
>
>how to choose for a Measuring Unity which would be common to the three
or
>more competing Types of Society?
>What would be the Qualitative Markers of such a Fractured Domain?
>
>These are our Perpignan Municipal groups questions, which came aroused
by
>the most recent activity on the French Elections,
>and their portrayal on the web since Monday Morning.
>
>It's unlikely that anybody can answer by just 'going to the streets',
but
>we opine its one of the best solutions.
>At least that's what we came up to as a palabra/conclusion tonight in
our
>group.
>
>Have a good one everyone!!!
>Regrds,
>John.Pett.
>_______________________________________________
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>Info:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>Archives: www.driftline.org 


<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>  <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>