[D-G] Fwd: New (Philosophy) Developments on the Web

John Young jya at pipeline.com
Sat Mar 4 16:47:47 PST 2017

All subscribers still here eternally unsubbed, 
twenty-plus years deeper in mire. All bitter at 
backing wrong nag bettor philosophers, except the 
better off soon dead surviving on the 
indigestible morsels of immortal roman a chefs 
D-G. Appreciation for the dumpster divinity diving.

At 07:25 PM 3/4/2017, you wrote:
>Hello . I am unsure of how many people are still 
>subscribed to this server that used to be 
>posting mails which have been inscribed in the 
>archives which i have browsed thru like in a 
>reverie & into which i spent the saturday night 
>fever. and really found some gems!, actually 
>followed thru by & from many different aliases 
>and  various real actors. now this one remains 
>amongst one of the most problematic for my own 
>understanding of whose mechanics into which   in 
>those times the list was being populated and 
>curated,: * * * * * * 
>* * * * * *From: "isa" 
><http://ketchup-AT-fish.co.jp>> Date: Thu, 20 
>Jul 2000 10:45:12 +0200 Subject: 
>=?ISO-8859-1?B?pyA=?=fun * Users, Sometimes its 
>hard not to cut the flow of messages prompting 
>without another message. May be some are like 
>me, and need a parallel Deleuze/Guattari list, 
>where we could seize the possibility of a common 
>graphic interface, on which, anonymously, each 
>user could draw, not necessarly write. The list 
>owner, or some of this server users interested 
>by this proposition could build this web page. 
>Or take inspiration from this: [snip: an url no 
>longer updated was being here provided] site. I 
>don't know anything in website construction, but 
>would be happy to contribute with anyone willing 
>to spare time to an alternative project, to the 
>impossibility to write one can experience 
>sometimes. Is it seductive? :)Isa 
>it's also ‚¬â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬ it's also interesting 
>if it happens we are ready to seek the meaning 
>of how we could manage such a list on 2017's 
>internet. (i say "we" and i know well i cannot 
>do it on my own or here bring this proposition 
>with people working for me, and also understand 
>that the list owner shall not feel to reply like 
>anon to the meaning which this 'isa' 
>ketchup at fish subscriber has by a unique mail 
>written into a cartesian mind, once i share this 
>meaning with you here) --> what can it tell us? 
>[let's set aside the derisive ending of the 
>message] - let me explain what's the appeal of 
>this proposal to me: i am interested, because my 
>job is 100% into the refurbishing of old walls, 
>with plastics and  all kinds of 3dprinted 
>materials. in order to do this print i am forced 
>to use a 3d software. i have to struggle so hard 
>to find the right 3d software. i thus go on 
>forums on the internet, subscribe to the mailing 
>lists, and there ask for 3d freelancers and meet 
>in skype with Ceos of a new start-ups experts in 
>code (nodes and graphics)   transfers: code 
>treatment between (previously) non compatible 3d 
>apps. that's why i meet the Ceos of tomorrow in 
>skipe.. i am thus told how soon everything is 
>going to be open and so speed-up with the 
>softwares, that even philosophers will have 
>leisures such as be able to draw and refurbish 
>old walls. they will no longer feel like not 
>having the time to study softwares, they'll skip 
>hurdles in mailing lists, and want to elicit the 
>right touch in a refurbisher software, and hire 
>and curate their own software development & 
>other construction workers in teams of 
>2x5x10x20, or more... i go everyday as well 
>explore the fields in the Architecture Industry, 
>and contemplate the young architects and the 
>graphic designers, how are they getting 
>acquainted with philosophy in university. (some 
>are so very young i'd say, and they study 
>physics bio-engeneering, and meta-data from the 
>start, as it is written by Ceos in the core of 
>their programs). And these are some trends of 
>philosophy which precisely disclassify 
>interdisciplinarity, and priviledge research and 
>experimental research, over 
>inter-disciplinarity!! Ask yourself: are you 
>yourself (in order to start the conversation in 
>this place) a philosopher? have you ever had 
>such a leisure? say like Baruch Spinoza with 
>glass polishing, or Emmanuel Kant having dinner 
>within a very strict schedule repeated day after 
>day , afternoon after afternoon, the same way, 
>people being entertained by your press readings 
>during the afternoon tea with an exquise 
>cosmopolitan conversation?) i think the meaning 
>of 'isa''s post today, what can happen with our 
>thoughts once we handle them in a computer could 
>help us to become slender like Kant, or become 
>witty like Aristotle, as with other peers handle 
>their mediums from one computer to the next, be 
>it owned by a single actor, or by so limited 
>number (on this server) adding themselves as 
>various actors building a common project in a 
>common network, bridged like other networks, to 
>the 2017's internet. You have read well: it's a 
>proposal. In Close Expectation, Best Regards - 
>Johnatan Petterson Wall Refurbisher.   at the 
>times (just setting aside the derisive ending of 
>the given message) 
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org 
>Archives: www.driftline.org

More information about the Deleuze-Guattari mailing list