[D-G] Concepts seen as functions (malgosia askanas)

[Harald Wenk]

Dear group,

The picture of the head ove water in a struggling
of swimming si raelly good,
but it ahs indded to eb expalined a lot.

You refer to the eternel intellectual part of the human mind, arent you?

Reardimng universal
notuions stay to
be:
ante re, in re, post re,
in spite they are THEMSELVES events or singularities.

(Ther are "copies" or "tokons", repetituions ).

"old fashioned" as I am,
I like to "translate" the old to the new
expresssions as undertandable a possible.
Especially,as there are lots and lots of notions in philolsophy,
not always good ones.

Buti like metaphers, symboles and images, narratives too.


greetings

Harald


At 5:04 PM -0700 7/29/11, Super Dragon wrote:
>hello, as i undersyand it language is not prior to the concept of the concept, language is merely the topslice of the unconcious and the non symbolizable is simultaneous with this in wip dg talk about concepts as laying out a plane over the nonconceptual in thinking in a way whic passes through its own components. i struggled with this for a long time until i was able to think of it a bit like swimming or treading water in so far as the actualisation is about movements which sustain a space of thought that suspends the thought of drowning (temporarily)
>
>hope that makes sense
>ruth
>nb maybe the letter a is better thought of as (a) indefinite article?
Sloughing one's skin.-The snake that cannot slough its skin perishes. Likewise spirits which are prevented from changing their opinions; they cease to be spirits (Nietzsche: Daybreak:V:573)