[Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much? - 200 members

[bwo cso]

thats far too many. and completely unimportant.

On 9/9/07, hwenk <hwenk at web.de> wrote:
>
> Hello members of this list,
>
> As you may have checked  yourself in the meanwhile,
> there are only 200 members of this list.
>
>
> My Vedanta story glimpses only certain aspects of it,
> as is  a very complex philosophy,
> studied in Indology
> and the current hold view
> of almost all
> Indian philosophical
> interested people,
> who follow Indian philosophy.
> In my eyes it is philosophical also compatible to a certain
> degree to western Deleuze and Guattari
> philosophy.
>
> As I pointed out before,
> such much possibilities
> of fundamental thinking do not exist.
>
>
>
> greetings Harald Wenk
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org
> [mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of hwenk
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2007 22:31
> To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> Subject: Re: [Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much?
>
>
> Dear Mr. Wouster,
>
> > Whom are your warning shignals aimed at Dr. Harald Wenk?
>
> The 2000 mebers of the list.
> There are some people  puzzeld,
> thiking there are lacking emails or
> there are conventions they do not know for this list.
> This is not the case.
> Almosz all of this not selfuilluminating or responding to
> a seelfillunijnating emails
> are
> from
> peole occuring for the firest time.
> But uf you read the amils,yougor the imppression
> they are tehmoderators of te list.
> They are definitely not.
> Sometimes people get very unpolite in their
> first emails, vanishing forever,
> using anothe rnam for their  next mail.
>
> You can check the archives.
>
> Thsi are cheap and dirty tricks,whic have bee used
> in this list.
> Sometimes poele are using alot of mor eor
> lknown names from authorsa of hard to understand books
> without explaining something, as if this is usual here .
> It is not.
>
>
> You are als very short a member of this list,
> not longer than a week.
> I am one, the only one, writing  scince several years.
>
>
> Greetings Harald Wenk
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org
> [mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of Wouter
> Kusters
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2007 17:03
> To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> Subject: Re: [Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much?
>
>
> Dear over 200 members of this list,
>
>
> > in my eyes it is a little bit puzzling
>
> Grab the puzzle and step out of your German language by way of the Deleuze
> into..English?
>
>
> > that there so few mails regarding so much member in this list, that
> discus
> >   friendly
>
> No problem, friend.
>
>
> > and in a manner expressing the wish to understand one another,
> > the world and the complex philosphy of Deluez Guattari or
> > Vedanta from India.
>
> Halleluiah Mother India! (mercy ghandhi)
>
>
> > I ask me, what someone who wants to sabotate this list in order
> > to make the understanding and further resaearch
> > of the complex Deleuze and Guattari philosphy more difficult
> > and almost impossible.
>
> What do (or did) you - in the real world - do with the group of
> "sabotators", and...where-in-what-country..?
>
>
> > Some emails in this list do something like this.
> > This is a pronblem not only for this list,
>
> Check the lists.
>
>
> > but if you want to fight a philophy or a theory,
> > most probaly because you have already another one,
> > contradictory one,
> > maybe almost in some professional way,
> > you may write such "saboating" and "desorientating" emails.
> > As it is possiblel to get emails accounts with
> > names you like, this is misused to sabotate discussions.
>
> Whom are your warning shignals aimed at Dr. Harald Wenk?
>
>
> > I remind that some insights from neurology and psychatry
> > are only to find in Deleuze Guattri -
> > and even there very hidden.
>
> Not only Deleuze et Guattari. Read your sources: Dr.Schreber.
>
> Dr. Wouter Kusters
> Netherlands - close-to-West-germany, wees niet bang/seid nicht angstig, am
> wenigstens, nicht fur mich.
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/wku/Index.html
>
>
> > Vedanta phiophy in India, whic are over one Billion people,
> > and the philopshy has a tradition about
> > 1500 years, with the "university languge" sanskrit,
> > which is even more complicated than larin.
>
> PS, OK, if so, compare Latin structure, Sanskrit structure, - by way of
> Greek structure - and judge your best structure.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>