[Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much? - 200 members

[hwenk]

Hello members of this list,

As you may have checked  yourself in the meanwhile,
there are only 200 members of this list.


My Vedanta story glimpses only certain aspects of it,
as is  a very complex philosophy,
studied in Indology
and the current hold view
of almost all
Indian philosophical
interested people,
who follow Indian philosophy.
In my eyes it is philosophical also compatible to a certain
degree to western Deleuze and Guattari
philosophy.

As I pointed out before,
such much possibilities
of fundamental thinking do not exist.



greetings Harald Wenk





-----Original Message-----
From: deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org
[mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of hwenk
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2007 22:31
To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
Subject: Re: [Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much?


Dear Mr. Wouster,

> Whom are your warning shignals aimed at Dr. Harald Wenk?

The 2000 mebers of the list.
There are some people  puzzeld,
thiking there are lacking emails or
there are conventions they do not know for this list.
This is not the case.
Almosz all of this not selfuilluminating or responding to
a seelfillunijnating emails
are
from
peole occuring for the firest time.
But uf you read the amils,yougor the imppression
they are tehmoderators of te list.
They are definitely not.
Sometimes people get very unpolite in their
first emails, vanishing forever,
using anothe rnam for their  next mail.

You can check the archives.

Thsi are cheap and dirty tricks,whic have bee used
in this list.
Sometimes poele are using alot of mor eor
lknown names from authorsa of hard to understand books
without explaining something, as if this is usual here .
It is not.


You are als very short a member of this list,
not longer than a week.
I am one, the only one, writing  scince several years.


Greetings Harald Wenk


-----Original Message-----
From: deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org
[mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces at lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of Wouter
Kusters
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2007 17:03
To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
Subject: Re: [Deleuze-Guattari] Why is this list sabotated so much?


Dear over 200 members of this list,


> in my eyes it is a little bit puzzling

Grab the puzzle and step out of your German language by way of the Deleuze
into..English?


> that there so few mails regarding so much member in this list, that discus
>   friendly

No problem, friend.


> and in a manner expressing the wish to understand one another,
> the world and the complex philosphy of Deluez Guattari or
> Vedanta from India.

Halleluiah Mother India! (mercy ghandhi)


> I ask me, what someone who wants to sabotate this list in order
> to make the understanding and further resaearch
> of the complex Deleuze and Guattari philosphy more difficult
> and almost impossible.

What do (or did) you - in the real world - do with the group of
"sabotators", and...where-in-what-country..?


> Some emails in this list do something like this.
> This is a pronblem not only for this list,

Check the lists.


> but if you want to fight a philophy or a theory,
> most probaly because you have already another one,
> contradictory one,
> maybe almost in some professional way,
> you may write such "saboating" and "desorientating" emails.
> As it is possiblel to get emails accounts with
> names you like, this is misused to sabotate discussions.

Whom are your warning shignals aimed at Dr. Harald Wenk?


> I remind that some insights from neurology and psychatry
> are only to find in Deleuze Guattri -
> and even there very hidden.

Not only Deleuze et Guattari. Read your sources: Dr.Schreber.

Dr. Wouter Kusters
Netherlands - close-to-West-germany, wees niet bang/seid nicht angstig, am
wenigstens, nicht fur mich.
http://home.wanadoo.nl/wku/Index.html


> Vedanta phiophy in India, whic are over one Billion people,
> and the philopshy has a tradition about
> 1500 years, with the "university languge" sanskrit,
> which is even more complicated than larin.

PS, OK, if so, compare Latin structure, Sanskrit structure, - by way of
Greek structure - and judge your best structure.





_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Archives: www.driftline.org

_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Archives: www.driftline.org