[D-G] To Reply

[.Sylvia_Jenepi.]

On 04.06.2021 02:57, Mike Lansing wrote:
> There is much content you have written in previous messages, and so
> will work backwards from Japanese subjectivity. Guattari’s Japanese
> subjectivity is mass-produced, D&G say: ‘The desire of a theory and
> its propositions should stick as closely as possible to the event and
> the expression of the masses. To achieve this, we must knit a new
> breed of intellectual, a new breed of analyst, a new breed of
> militant: blending the different types and running them together. We
> started with the idea that desire must not be conceived as a
> subjective superstructure that is more or less occluded. Desire never
> stops investing history, even in its darkest periods.’
> (Desert Islands and Other Texts, Deleuze and Guattari Fight Back)
> 
> 
> One could read this excerpt in many ways, though for Japan, “running
> them together” is Guttari’s take on the Japanese subject, who uses
> hight-tech melded with the almost prehistoric. This reminds Mike of
> Guattari’s suggestion that “what comes after can change what came
> before” in L’inconscient machinique. The Japanese subject could come
> to be interested, rather than not giving a fuck, once they thought it
> was (in style [italics]).
> 
> They would have to see a mass movement along these lines, though they
> hold great potential for the
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info: 
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org


Hi Mike,
Sorry if the vulgar word fuck caused a distortion in your appreciation 
of what i was saying.

This email will be shorter and less interesting i guess. sorry for my 
hubris in so saying.

It seems from the Desert Island quote, that Deleuze intention was thus 
to « accelerate the movement of what i have called the « time matter » 
strata: in order to rise up mankind’s vibration, to higher up strata.
this was the purpose of «  artisan cosmique » trying to practice «  
heterogenesis » and increasing connexion of heterogenous parts in the 
socius. he started by connecting « concepts » and « authors » of the 
field of philosophers from past. Then he moved on with connecting 
thoughts from science, art, politics, in a kind of new labyrinth, 
superimposed on the labyrinth which is time matter strata: with both 
exits: one up, one down.

then both in what is philosophy and critique and clinique, he tried to 
« connection » increase art/religion/science with philosophy

then he went off planet.

Guattari was trying to connect this Deleuze’s cosmic artisanship effort 
to accelerate the vibration within mankind, by instigating his 
cartography
with « head hunters » becomings. encouraging militants to disengage from 
the low vibration « communist » or « psychoanalystic » or « ecologic » 
massive entity, creating a perimeter of fresh air (accelerated 
connections)  for a new kind of society of « subjectivities » that its a 
bit of an experimentation, he was treating our minds (the reader’s) like 
worms eating his apples, and have fun at observing their wriggle/ 
giggles, thinking this was the first step in the acceleration. ( i am 
not even sure he had such hopes)



in any case what happened was treated in my last post: the « new wave » 
deleuze was enjoying creating for « surfers »: intellection authors, 
artists, with « shrinking «  relations one with the others ( think for 
contrast with what society there is in Henry Miller Big Sur and Orange 
of H.Bosh , or the ones in Jack Kerouak in subterraneans, on the 
road,..)
In short Deleuze effect, the accelerated society, how to say it has been 
captured by internet grid.
the coherence of the deleuzian logic has created an independent «  
research program » ( cfr Lakatos) but a few years after 1995 and 1993 
the logic went
under the supervision of an « eye in the sky » which is not Spinoza’s 
idea of the multiplicity of modes, but a head point of view, a king-god 
divinity like in Assyro-Babylonia, whose collective-shrinking block 
creativity of most authors minds and sense of creative community, this 
eye lives some live of its own, from an orbital 40000 feet in the 
atmosphere, the eye in the sky watches movements on the surface down 
below. this idiot king-god divinity i contend, is not capable anymore to 
send new head hunters to « steal fire » (Arthur Rimbaud) from the 
collective subjectivities masses of Japan, Europe, Israel, you name it 
(as i said, the autonomous intelligence which because the « masses 
expression » reappropriated dg logic, dg research program has lost 
independency from what eye in the sky controls the masses, and the 
king-priest eye in the sky offers no soul to his followers (quite the 
contrary: it offers covid19 vaccine!!) cut them off from etheric 
environment in relation with spinoza’s  substance and can not 
offer/poetize no pathic affective aprehension/generation with the modes 
helping this substance). ( head hunter translates « têtes chercheuses » 
btw: see visagéité année zéro, ATP)
guattari /deleuze subjectivities are thus part of a development in this 
civilisation (a monad, see Toynbee) which is destined to crash.
it can possibly  be replaced by the new earth and sovereign 
singularities.

sorry again for insulting Japanese cultural sensibility, for which i 
have love and respect.
Peace
Sylvia, Messenger of queen Id-Zabillya, from republic of Ostya.

xx