[D-G] sarah halimi, antonin artaud and France's criminal treatment of madness

[Johnatan Petterson]

from Wikkipedia:

<< The *Sarah Halimi* case concerns the murder of a Jewish
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jew> woman aged 65 in Paris
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris> on 4 April 2017 by Kobili Traoré, a
native of Mali who shouted "shut your mouth", *Allahu Akbar
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahu_Akbar>*, and "I killed the Shaitan"
during the murder. The suspect claimed insanity and was hospitalized.

The Paris Court of Appeal, while officially acknowledging the anti-semitic
nature of the murder on December 19, also concluded that Traoré was
“criminally irresponsible” because "he was too high" to understand what he
was doing. >>


is there some Mille Plateaux or Henri Michaux insight to be got from dg
into this affair?


irresponsibility . schizophrenia. dementia.

why on earth do you judge the schizophren, the madman as incapable of
judgment ?

Spinoza presented the eternal law, that if you destroy some other human
being (hatred)

retaliation naturally ensue where the human being wants to destroy you.

why are "anti-semitism" or "racism" worsening circumstances in French law
and probably elswhere?

because the State wants to avoid civil war.

civil war shall corrupt the State who do not heed to that.

commentator likewise argue that alcohol or drug consuming is also a
worsening circumstance when committing such a crime or any offence.

here French Court judged instead (!) that the drug consuming was a power
able to free, freeing the guilty from prosecution.

he is not currently in an Asylum.

the insane murderer seems absolved, left free by the European new Law
enforcement. the new european Natural Right Philosophy has taken over ?

why often when a terrorist is seen as a schizophren,  French treatment in
official Communication is that

"he is (just) another schizophren"?  does this mean he is Not Human ? is it
because the High Court judges have read Deleuze?

why could it not be assumed that schizophren(s) can understand Spinoza
themselves ?

how do Schizophrens (and Paranoids)  understand Law ?

the answer seems easy: by applying the Force of Law to them in Equal Term
as with anyone !

the Fear of Justice the Fear of getting from the Pleasant Realm of
Imagination to HELL !

Stop treating the Madman as incapable to understand this.

We live in the same Universe.

If he does not beleive so, do not be led astray by the Madman Judgment!

otherwise dear Europeans, your French State is corrupt. Soon it will be the
end of it, you will see,  if you do not heed to include the Madness into
the State's Laws.

Instead than the crual electrochocs, psychotherapies and the infantilizing
Asylum,

Treat (instead please ) everyone Equal.

Enough of this Naive Religious Catholicism of the French State !

Do not put the OTHER, your next of kin, in the colonial Cocoon of your
patronizing  "understanding".

the People having dark Religious Criminal Philosophy:

the schizophren(s), the racists, the antisemites, the drug addict, the
alcohol sippers, and the internet abusers, need to heed to their inner Dark
Side, need to be given the opportunity to clean their SICKNESS away by
fearing to go to Jail if they forget the Powers of Reality how soon they
are about to commit a crime how ignorant they are of the Powers of the Real.

Percicles and Verdi: Deleuze : becoming non-human, if it implies capacity
to contemplate your World of Ideas from outside, and self-destroy your
false perception, otherwise Jail and soooo long lasting hell time.

France, give up the Imagination. Pay heed to the Real.