[D-G] Australia is Burning

[Johnatan Petterson]

There are four discussed tropisms about travel: the idiot. The travel by an
idiot. ( beckett)
The einstein relativity in travel ( nomads staying and their path crossed
by the idiot ) ( toynbee )
Reason : a certain vision collected while standing still. ( nerval )
The vacuity of such discussion on « travel »: the idiot of fitzgerald.
This leaves plenty to the Chinese Emperor Intelligent Service to the crowds
of China.
How should we see the idiot who travels to China? As a part of the
intellectual war machine?
As someone who has minorized the minority to quite an extent? A hyper-fold.
As someone who only experiences opinion when distinguishing Imagination
versus Reason, as a result of which, someone who mistakes his opinions as
reasons, as someone who mistrust the power of the deserted in-between,
Someone who is crowded, and who is the inside-out of the hyper-fold? Its
other side. The two forming a complete Invisible Character.
Which shows how intellectual war machines grow and become crowds of China.
The relation between the Invisible Character and the intellectual crowds of
China is the next frontier, that for which we settle our decipherment of «
that which was forgotten because polyindirectly begotten », the relations
neither in-between nor outside.

Johnny Petterson

Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 15:48, Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com> a
écrit :

> Disturbingly swiftly it happened, though early on, Massumi (A User's Guide
> to Capitalism and Schizophrenia) was aware of the Yellow Emperor's
> avaricious plans and the spectre of Chinese frontier capitalism.
> Australia's politicians have colluded with the Chinese in the sell-out of
> the Australian people. Just-another-business-day capitalism:
>
>
>
> Following the Watercourse
>
>
> 1 Dec 2019 China Buying Australia
>
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7725675/How-China-owns-Australia-buying-infrastructure-land-water.html
>
>
>
>
> 'It could be argued that Ronald Reagan was already present at the
> foundation of the Chinese Empire or that he is an avatar of the "First
> Emperor": that he has been alive since the dawn of history, or has died
> countless deaths, from fishy suicide to a failed assassination that in a
> sense succeeded because he walked away from it, the corpse that he already
> was. It always comes down to the same thing: equating the population with a
> bounded space or territory, saturating the territory with executive
> apparatuses, beaming onto every resulting surface projections of a despotic
> body whose form embodies an idea of unity as it disappears. Bush has also
> been to China. The characteristically imperial apparatus -- the bureaucracy
> --is an Asiatic-Bush-thing with many an American cousin. The First Emperor
> had a restricted number of apparatuses at his disposal: the army, the
> mutual-spying machine, agriculture, hydraulics and other public works, all
> under the control of an overarching bureaucracy.
> ....
> "The transfer from the Empire of China to the Empire of the Self is
> never-ending." (Victor Segalin)'
> (Massumi B, First and Last Emperors)
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org

-- 
ziboote depuis mon iphoaunesixplus