[D-G] Communism definitions Physics

[Mike Lansing]

Deleuze's progress in rad univocity was already stated when he wrote,:
"god dances on a volcano" (D&R). JP writes: ' nothing helps explaining
the universe as well as have been done. the idea of an absence of
foundation just means that <basis of itself> thing, which is not
requiring any false attributes or predicates.'

Along with Deleuze's statement about volcanoes, a Deleuzean concept of
the "inorganic" destroys the concept of god, literally. Deleuze would
have easily known about the 1952 Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiment,
which obliterates the concept of an entity complete within itself
(<basis of itself>), the concept of an intentional thinking force, so
akin to the fundamental illusions of H. sapiens. This holds even when
the Prisoner admits to believing in the disjunctive syllogism: the
reason why the Miller-Urey experiment destroys the concept of god, too,
is because if there is a god (as Haegglund argues in Radical Atheism),
that god is necessarily mortal DNA. Thus, the information anarchy done
to god is the undoing of the representation of the precise signifier,
'god' accompanied by Guattari's radically atheist Other when quoting
Sade's Julliette along the lines of, "there is nothing unique about DNA
that thinks." 


<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
>Sent: 3/12/2019 3:37:14 PM
>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>Subject: Re: [D-G] Communism definitions Physics
>
>*Mike, please*
>
>*have a further look: search in that time period.*
>
>*when emmanuel videcoq wanted to know the difference between
>haecceities and singularities.*
>
>*answers from various "participants" ensue. Paul Bains etc.*
>
>
>
>*if you answer in relation to what I said recently here last week, i
>would say that my thought have come to a conclusion*
>
>*uttering in brief that Deleuze thoughts, although claiming an
>originality, Deleuze claiming with haeceitty being independent from
>substance,*
>
>*although having some reference with Leibniz various substances,*
>
>*is less interesting as regards to Ha Shem, than Spinoza's strict
>observation of the production of modes, and somehow not a progress*
>
>*or rather the progress would be in that solely to denegate Deleuze's
>claim to progress in univocity.*
>
>
>*yet I think that Deleuze is a Jewish Thinker anyhow. it could be
>studied in the yeshivot. ATP could be, it would be a progress to
>consider Deleuze a Jewish Thinker,*
>
>*whatever his praise of Arafat as human being, if that makes sense.*
>
>*my kind regards from*
>
>*Johnny.*
>
>*Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:49:34 -0500
>From: "widder" <widder-AT-lsealumni.com>
>Subject: Re: Haecceity??
>*
>
>Paul Bains wrote:
>
>]...][[...[
>
>>
>> There is a difference btwn the 'deeper game' (jeu plus profond) of 
>quantum
>> fields/particles and that of empsyched individuals ('primary true
forms')
>> which are not simply 'surface effects' or systemic 'emergencings'.
>
>What is your point here?
>
>Nathan
>widder-AT-lsealumni.com
>
>>
>>
>> "I have always being fascinated by the mystery of eclosion.' Henry 
>miller.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 21:12, Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com> a
>écrit :
>
>> No, we believe Widder was on an earlier D&G archive before 2004.
>>
>> <-----Original Message----->
>> >From: Mike Lansing [badger2 at mail2world.com]
>> >Sent: 3/12/2019 11:44:44 AM
>> >To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>> >Subject: Re: [D-G] Communism definitions Physics
>> >
>> >OK, the search function might retrieve pertinence to what Johnny
Pett
>> >is asking about.
>> ><-----Original Message----->
>> >>From: malgosia askanas [ma at panix.com]
>> >>Sent: 3/11/2019 4:05:35 PM
>> >>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>> >>Subject: Re: [D-G] Communism definitions Physics
>> >>
>> >>No, not always, though I don't remember at what point I added it.
>> >>
>> >>On 2019-03-11 12:30, Mike Lansing wrote:
>> >>> Was there always a search function for the archives? We seem 
>to
>> >>> remember difficulty with searches. Thanks for the 
>assistance.
>> >>_______________________________________________
>> >>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>> >>Info:
>> >http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-
>driftline.org
>> >>Archives: www.driftline.org
>> >>.
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>> >Info:
>>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>> >Archives: www.driftline.org
>> >.
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>> Info:
>>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>> Archives: www.driftline.org
>>
>_______________________________________________
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>Info:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>Archives: www.driftline.org