[D-G] a b (its) c conference.

[Mike Lansing]

The 'what-is-ness' of the world ontology goes fractal: "Today the gaze
is forensic." (Braidotti, Deleuze and Law), fractals detected in
cerebral blood flow in the resting brain will be viewed forensically,
drilling down, always layers under other layers, doing information
anarchy to assumptions, cynical capitalist assumptions, for example.

<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
>Sent: 3/19/2017 5:14:28 PM
>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>Subject: Re: [D-G] a b (its) c conference.
>
>*Governmentalities of the Digital: Mapping, Sensing and Hacking*
>*by David Chandler*
>
>Abstract:
>In this presentation I explore three ways of rethinking the human
through
>the digital. The first is reactive; here, the use of ubiquitous data is
>seen to enable new methods of mapping/tracing relations in time and
space.
>In this paradigm, problems are seen more clearly through an ontology of
>depth, 'drilling down' to context where processes/path dependencies
come to
>light which can be intervened in. The second is responsive, the
paradigm of
>sensing and datafication: seeing relations in real-time, to enable
>increasingly automated processes of governing emergence. Here, the
Internet
>of Things and cyborg more-than-human assemblages are imagined to govern
>with rather than over or against potential problems or threats of
climate
>change, disease or socio-economic crises. The goal is that of
resilience:
>the maintenance of the status-quo or homeostatic governance. The third
form
>of adaptation is autopoietic, less goal-directed and therefore more
>future-orientated, for example, hacking as a project of exploration of
the
>possibilities of relations and processes, detaching and repurposing
>assemblages creating new possibilities. In all three, the
'what-is-ness' of
>the world is given its due; there are no assumptions of linear,
abstract or
>universal frames of knowledge or governmental capacity. They could also
be
>seen as stages through which 'the digital', in enabling adaptive
>possibilities, has facilitated the building of a home in a posthuman
world.
>
>2017-03-17 0:00 GMT+01:00 Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com>:
>
>> This from the Aut-opsy list:
>>
>> Digital Objects, Digital Subjects
>>
http://icts-and-society.net/events/digital-objects-digital-subjects-a-sy
>>
mposium-on-activism-research-critique-in-the-age-of-big-data-capitalism-
>> the-6th-icts-society-conference/
>>
>>
>> --->
>the number first seems to be the Science/Physis approach.
Science/Physis
>using the digital
>elements to explore what is not (yet) digitalized. [the justification
can
>be the empowerment of the (not yet digitalized) inhabitants of this
digital
>home based in the posthuman world]
>then the next phase (number second) happens when everything
>has become Assumptions and thus this shall happen in Future Real-Time
>{(David Chandler notices how (Future) Real-Time is resilient, that is,
>if you remember about the rhizomes which the (an)droid's understanding
>explores in our current Science/Physis; -he phrases this:
>'the due"what-is-ness"of the world'-... })
>the last (third) phase in this abstract, is after being forced to
confront
>phase one and phase two noticed in its character, Science/Physis has
>finally accepted to relate with a-phasic sensuality to this two-phasic
>aspect
>of it's own abc procedurality ,or (non)digital instinct.
>
>
>--->
>_______________________________________________
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>Info:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>Archives: www.driftline.org 


<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>  <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>