[D-G] unmoderated discussion list
Super Dragon
superdragon at addlebrain.com
Sun Sep 5 20:04:48 PDT 2010
Hi Charles
I remember the moderator debate years ago on Spoons. At the time, I
was very anti the list being moderated as I felt that list members
could striate the space themselves for example, filtering out what
each classified as junk mail rather than have a moderator do it.It
didn't work-the list became full of narcissistic pseudo schizos whose
sole purpose it seemed was to sabotage any form of debate.
Ten years on ( and still not much interesting debate) I have moved to
the view that explicit light touch moderation is not such a bad idea
as no striation results in undifferentiated mush. And, with the best
will in the world, complaining that the moderator can't see why your
post is a mess doesn't stop it being a mess! You can't have it both
ways-the freedom of email is that it is not limited to local context
even though it is undoubtedly limited by it. Sounds like the real
frustration here is not moderation but getting a less restricted
space to write at all. And with that I genuinely sympathize
Cheers R
--- solntsepyati at yahoo.com wrote:
>From: charles hubaker <solntsepyati at yahoo.com>
To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
Subject: Re: [D-G] unmoderated discussion list
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Three dimensions and context is what is relevant. Malgosia was not in the
library in Indiana where the attempt to transmit information to this list was
being made. The local gestapo having deliberately dumbed down the ergonomics
(crouched like a frog, peering into a cabinet to look at a computer screen,
while being videotaped buy security) makes the moderator's referral to the
message as 'a mess' quite out of context. This writer also has a spelling and
typo problem, but even without glasses, one should not worry too much about
spell checking. One should, however, worry about State surveillance. Thus, at
least one reason to eliminate the moderator.
We note the D&G-style article published a while back, on whale-viewing in
Australia. The author describes the experimentation of traffic
flows. In another
location, the U.S., we see here (in three actual dimensions) a like experiment
whereby the median strip between lanes is (fenced[italics]) so that the
pedestrian has to do a kind of genuflexion and travel to the crooks of the
nazi-atheist cross (the intersection) to make either a left or right turn.
Again, the moderator is not there, but the moderator and other readers simply
have to take the writer's word for it ("I'm writing from the Kent State
campus").
More information about the Deleuze-Guattari
mailing list