[Deleuze-Guattari] waffling, again...

Wouter Kusters C.W.Kusters at let.ru.nl
Sun Sep 9 06:20:13 PDT 2007


Hi henkw

> Now Badiou and me are used from amthematics and other sciences,
> that if you don not understand the things down to the details and 
> examples,
> you did not understand much.
> That is also according to Deleuze and Guattari.

Is it? Where do they write that exactly?
 
> And, it is not so complicated,
> for there is nobody who will torture if
> some thought is not the last word in the
> issue under consideration.
> But it is not very helpful, if there
> are no consifderations at all in ana email
> or a dialog, an answeeer to a question or
> an answer to an answewerror
> an prsuing sonme issue.
> 
> It is a "fals kind of being shy",
> as good old Spinoza had put it.

thnx Spinoza!
 
> On the other hand,
> desorientating discussions by free, spontaneos
> irritaing emails is a verys trang misuse of freedom
> and friendlieness to concern oneself
> with questions of other people.

What are you talking about? What e-mails? Are they in the archive?
 
> On main wewoek, explaining Deleuze imn other words
> is the book of DeLanda,
> which incorporates also mathematics.

DeLanda? Sounds interesting!

wku




More information about the Deleuze-Guattari mailing list