[Deleuze-Guattari] an opened Ghestalt

[Wouter Kusters]

> hello,
>
> Indeed, but the point was the psychic status of the world and the
> phantasm,
> according and Spinoza and Vedanta and ourselves.

OK, so you want to plug in the Venezian Vedanta instead of Pi Ss. OK. No
problemo!

> One of the points of Deleuze and Guattari is
> the status of phantasm and real putting together
> as acting directly on another.
>
> The most pragmatic reason for this differentiation was,
> that almost any information urges to be test if its true
> or what consequences it has.
> You have mostly to look at your already known
> things an has an open question.
> This may change the course of action and
> has a super individual tendency.
> Of special interest is fear,
> having a great deal of phantasm parts.

Fear of phantasm parts floats between Sadistioc Slim Cruelties and the long
HIdden Trails of Living Eternal "Minds"? Or perhaps something 'in Reality'?

> The other thing is, looking in the archive,
> especially in former times

What did they whisper Then?

> there are a lot of emails,
> for example a program from
> the university of Budapest

Sounds pretty hammerless to me..

> or a announced monkey who typed,
> The authors hade made themselves a fun
> or wanted to hinder a new
> discussion to be pursued.
> Especially it is from already known members of  this list.
>
>
> Mostly this destroys
> the thread of a discussion.
> The possibility to tell "fun" emails
> to one having some  kind
> of demanding more serious tackling
> is often not so easy.

Completed tasks are often looked back as more easily than in front of it (or
Them).

> As I wrote often calling Derrida,
> this is no good ethics of
> communication or cooperation.

Both communication as well as cooperation have their end watch-towers in
Endless hidden messages (whether they stem from Budapest, Cairo or some
other Dribe).

> The "open questions" or "Gestalts"
> bother one - most striking in
> false alarms.
> The "Gestalt is also used as a category. in "Chaosmose" by Guattari.
>  "Open questions" are the psychic
> mechanism the "fun" of "fun" emails often relies on.
>
> As  Deleuze and Guattari rightly point out,
> there are different kind of humours.
>
> Often for these emails,
> the intensity  of fun and humour  is very low.

Watch out, their are Friends nearby, whose intensity is out of the questIon.

Do not brother,

WK, from the left of Holland.