[D-G] Re: grammar used by Pretzel

[nadeem hameed]

from where the idea of captlism comes to ascritan the fact of grammar.
its being mythic is also an absurdity.
On 9/12/05, Liza Kozner <liza_kozner at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> the grammar is mythic but how useful is it if
> you are not a capitalist.
> 
> 
> 
>  how is fruits it usefull. codes is also the new
> fashion in electronic arts since last year, from
> hiphop to webpage everything is hypely coded. 
> Nietsche has criticised the value of use both inside
> economical structuralist of the brits era, and within
> other pulp factory figus trees yard closed until the
> zero point where use is of no importance as a concept.
> its a word which can be banished from the admirer of
> Nietzsche philosophy, because it does not offer no
> more ressonance on which to let grow anything in
> exchange of ones admiration of the syphillitic
> Philosopher. the minimalism of language one important
> writer after an other important writer is something
> which should be taken to the Niagara Falls by the new
> lyra arrived on the vessels. the minimalism of
> litterature has to get to this place of dissonance
> where gammar offer no more saliency to ordinary
> language than words. please explain why is grammar
> useful to you? ty
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ 
> Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
> voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>