Fwd: Re: [D-G] the "virtual"

malgosia askanas ma at panix.com
Thu Jun 23 10:37:04 PDT 2005

> In actual fact, I spoke up the moment it began.  You might have
> noticed that I wrote "each time I respond to this post", meaning
> "this" post. (!)  I assume that by "sulking" you are refering to my
> complaints about the other spam I receive (as does everyone else on
> the list) that passes for list material.  

No, I was referring to the fact that you said  the particular error response
happened "every time you respond to this post" and that if this goes on, you 
will have to unsub - all of this indicated (to me) that this was a repeating
condition that you had, heretofore, born in silent grimness.

> So far there have been many
> (!) list members who have spoken up about this other level of junk
> that fills our boxes.  There is at least one member who is sending
> posts from multiple addresses, and they are all generally unreadable.=20
> So, damn right I'm sulking, and I have spoken up before, as have
> others.  When is the "moderator" (!) going to do something about
> it?!?!?

Well, this here moderator is not going to do anything about it unless there
begins to be something worthwhile going on on the list.  If there were any 
attempts at a real expression or thought or discussion, then there would be 
some reason to defend THAT against disruption.  But there is none of THAT
in evidence, and the world offers many more worthwhile occupations than 
defending from silliness a list nobody is otherwise making any use of.

It could be that this list has simply run its course, and that nobody is
intersted in disussing Deleuze and Guattari via email any more.  Or nobody
is intersted in Deleuze and Guattari.  Or everybody already understands 
everything pertaining to Deleuze and Guattari and there is nothing to discuss.
And so on.


More information about the Deleuze-Guattari mailing list