[D-G] D&G reading group...a merry band

Gondo -Minnie gondominnie at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jun 1 07:14:09 PDT 2005


Master Loucy!!

Me Apprentice of Scientistifics so me thinks not Yet;
But sees me the Revoluschion in You, I DO!

Gondo
 Minnie
--- joan carol urquhart <jcu at execulink.com> wrote:

> 
> It's interesting mb,
> if academics give "poets" the power
> to disuade them (from borderlines),
> but not the other way around...
> 
> You comment brought me to this quote from ATP...
> 
> "If the anomalous is neither an individual nor a
> species,
> then what is it?" (D&G)
> 
> Like Captain Ahab's white whale,
> his white wall, his becoming-Moby Dick...
> 
> "That the anomalous is the borderline makes it
> easier for us
> to understand the various positions it occupies in
> relation to
> the pack or the multiplicity it borders, and the
> various positions
> occupied by a fascinated Self...In any event, the
> pack has a
> borderline, and an anomalous position, whenever in a
> given space
> an animal is on the line or in the act of drawing
> the line in relation to
> that which all the other members of the pack will
> fall into one
> of two halves, left or right : a peripheral
> poisition, such that it is
> impossible to tell if the nomalous is still in the
> band, already outside
> the band, or at the shifting boundary of the band."
> (D&G)
> 
> >From their amazing writing machine to this list...
> 
> 
> (This is not a poem.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "maria-belen ordonez" Cc: <
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [D-G] D&G reading group
> 
> 
> This listserv is a contradiction and yet I'm
> inclined to reply. I will
> however
> attempt to say SOMETHING. The rhizome may start in
> the middle but its
> existence
> needs a line of flight that is always productive.
> So, do I attach my
> thoughts
> and words to revolution even if I think it is
> anti-experiment? OR do I urge
> politely that people ELABORATE their cryptic
> thoughts?
> 
> mb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Liza Kozner <liza_kozner at yahoo.co.uk>:
> 
> > --
> > Hi Tedd Nodd,
> >
> > This incredible is not it's a revolution, IN the
> News
> > and Coverage, has this not passed through the
> Veils of
> > Maya ? Then shall we so effort strive, and it's
> > sensation, the sensation of the revolution by one
> or
> > the other way, of the French Revolution of the
> ultra
> > ultra Leftist NO to TCE shall passed through Maya
> by
> > veils when time obliges us to be void and let the
> > sensation of it so America can get in powered with
> the
> > event aswell.  By a sensation it will be offered
> to
> > you, to realize the content of the event. Not by
> > sadness.
> >
> > Bye Dear Friend unknown.
> > - Neil Todd <skinnerboxing at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > AH, THE MIGHTY REVOLUTION!  WHAT WARMTH IT
> BRINGS
> > > US!
> > >
> > > >From: Lucy LeGentilSinge
> > > <lucy100millionyearsold at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > >Reply-To:
> > >
> deleuze-guattari-driftline.org at lists.driftline.org
> > > >To:
> > >
> deleuze-guattari-driftline.org at lists.driftline.org
> > > >Subject: Re: [D-G] D&G reading group
> > > >Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:45:41 +0100 (BST)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I think a reading like the one you talk about
> and
> > > >which never existed probably in real is like a
> > > debate
> > > >on TV, and it's not
> > > >possible to enjoy it and aswell enjoy
> litterature
> > > such
> > > >as is actually DG. If you enjoy debates about
> DG
> > > and
> > > >aswell enjoy DG, you should know by now about
> > > >something is stuck wrong deep with you. if you
> feel
> > > >enough conscious to be open and ask if you were
> not
> > > >the one wrong, Correct it this way:  Deleuze
> > > himself
> > > >would have said influence of Modern
> Contemporary
> > > art
> > > >on Thinking, or theory practice, is coming from
> > > >outside or away than their own Deleuzian
> thought.
> > > Find
> > > >out what to connect with. If we like Deleuze
> the
> > > >option is between finding inspiration from or
> not
> > > from
> > > >DG, but not in discussing DG's tools by
> mass-media
> > > >tools like readings, poetic or
> > > accademic/individualist
> > > >groups. NO to the Passivity of Deleuzian
> Readers
> > > and
> > > >indifferent, such as "intellectuals", or
> > > >deterritorialists. What's positive nowadays are
> the
> > > >molecularist social movements, the analysis of
> > > >productive key actors why those for example in
> need
> > > of
> > > >DG would like to talk about and knot, anchor
> around
> > > >things and do intereactive readings and enjoy
> such
> > > >readings hoping by then and by reputation, DG
> > > should
> > > >become interesting for them, all this is
> nonsense
> > > and
> > > >stems from your self's passivity, and absence
> of
> > > >democratic will around you. So sad! Actually
> sad
> > > that
> > > >to visualise it, then should you be more happy
> and
> > > >less subjectivised by other ppl's ideas. So
> forget
> > > >about readings, either on Internet : if we
> gather
> > > here
> > > >it's got nothing to do with DG in whatever way
> that
> > > is
> > > >interesting for DG and us, their followers will
> > > agree
> > > >blindly. The Neo-Cons will agree to this. So
> > > realize
> > > >who you are and make a change. Why?
> > > >
> > > >More aside this, about specifically the
> net-Lists
> > > on
> > > >DG.
> > > >What could be interesting is to knot reading of
> DG
> > > >around nothing. Yeas you read well. We would
> gain
> > > more
> > > >by non Deleuzian, new movements of thoughts
> then
> > > >rehearsing for n-th time DG here or other
> parts.
> 
=== message truncated ===



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com



More information about the Deleuze-Guattari mailing list