Fwd: Re: [D-G] Specific Policy
gondominnie at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Jul 3 11:31:03 PDT 2005
PS: THIS IS LIZA
WRITING 2 DG LISTERS ALL OVER THE WORLD
Do you think this list has ashieved anything good.
I am relatively new here.
I only started posting last winter. I have browsed a
bit of the postings. But i
am willing to discuss the value of past posts.
I think the Orpheus-Fili exchange are sucking.
Inna and Paul Bryant have stopped posting.
There are more and more embarrassement, the spammer
and the poet are mixed.
Is this is also a problem for undeciphering, and see
I am wanting to discover what is this list doing.
Someone has an idea.
Somebody is talking too loud. Orpheus has a nice
Is actually Orpheus and Eurydice talking like from the
same computer, or the same paradigm of poetry.
Also the question of relation to Deleuze is not clear.
I think the quality should be stressed, the specific
"singularity " of the intercessive quality inside the
remaining fragments of the collaboration between
Guattari and Deleuze is not stressed sufficiently.
The nature of the local Government has taken
The local people
giving things dynamics
in the civil war it was this this and this which
allowed the reconstruction
I would that's whats important
--- Gondo -Minnie <gondominnie at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I mean its a while that we are using Gondo's, and
> Gondo we see received an interesting mail by "Mark",
> Mark Crosby, wondering if Gondo could come to ski in
> Can you tell mark if he's capable to make sure Gondo
> can climb. wE ARE sCIENTIST, WE DO NOT YET KNOW IF
> --- malgosia askanas <ma at panix.com> wrote:
> > > In actual fact, I spoke up the moment it began.
> > You might have
> > > noticed that I wrote "each time I respond to
> > post", meaning
> > > "this" post. (!) I assume that by "sulking" you
> > are refering to my
> > > complaints about the other spam I receive (as
> > everyone else on
> > > the list) that passes for list material.
> > No, I was referring to the fact that you said the
> > particular error response
> > happened "every time you respond to this post" and
> > that if this goes on, you
> > will have to unsub - all of this indicated (to me)
> > that this was a repeating
> > condition that you had, heretofore, born in silent
> > grimness.
> > > So far there have been many
> > > (!) list members who have spoken up about this
> > other level of junk
> > > that fills our boxes. There is at least one
> > member who is sending
> > > posts from multiple addresses, and they are all
> > generally unreadable.=20
> > > So, damn right I'm sulking, and I have spoken up
> > before, as have
> > > others. When is the "moderator" (!) going to do
> > something about
> > > it?!?!?
> > Well, this here moderator is not going to do
> > anything about it unless there
> > begins to be something worthwhile going on on the
> > list. If there were any
> > attempts at a real expression or thought or
> > discussion, then there would be
> > some reason to defend THAT against disruption.
> > there is none of THAT
> > in evidence, and the world offers many more
> > worthwhile occupations than
> > defending from silliness a list nobody is
> > making any use of.
> > It could be that this list has simply run its
> > course, and that nobody is
> > intersted in disussing Deleuze and Guattari via
> > email any more. Or nobody
> > is intersted in Deleuze and Guattari. Or
> > already understands
> > everything pertaining to Deleuze and Guattari and
> > there is nothing to discuss.
> > And so on.
> > -m
> > _______________________________________________
> > List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> > Info:
> > Archives: www.driftline.org
> How much free photo storage do you get? Store your
> snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
More information about the Deleuze-Guattari