[D-G] Archives

[Lucy LeGentilSinge]

Hi

by reading you i have the impression you understand
what i asked you, and talked about.
by reading you also, the contrary appears to my
consciousness. You seduces me, that's normal.

that you don't understand this is normal, because the
plane is not here,-- i was wondering indeed why nobody
understand what i write. it's because the plane is not
there. i should make a plane now. :) i should not talk
about it, but like more human beings than my own work.
so cannot feel ashamed.

i am writing very bad i let you think this happyly

the reason i am answering: is, that i find it, yet, it
will i am sure look contradictory
but i want to understand, or rather feel where's the
problem if there is something which is not passing
between to you and from me.

theorize this as you want, "biunivocity", it will only
be more deleuzian arguments, now the time is to let
you see that my question was about
Faucoult : did he ask to himself the question: to give
the reader the event, and you say it's naturally done,
yet the question is not, and actually there nothing
you have not misunderstood , and i was "all" wrong,
anyway, let me phrase this: do you know that they
could though raise the question, when studying Greek
Sexuality, about discovering little chatter between
Male and Lesbian Lovers in a street, etc. You imagine
the thing: extracts, archeological extracts, from
which a "parfume" sheds away across centuries, and
moves previous limits. 

Do you understand? Maybe mysteryous as this you will
want to understand something of my question?
The question do not seem alien to Metaphysiscs of
Cinema at this point. Are you interested by Cinema? Of
course you are right, and in case this seems strange,
let it be answered by someone else on the list.
Bye
bye

Adline
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:44:32 -0800, "sid littlefield"
<falsedeity at lycos.com> said:
> It does not strike me that the event is able to
remain 'intact' through
> an archi--- sid littlefield <falsedeity at lycos.com>
wrote: 
> It does not strike me that the event is able to
> remain 'intact' through an archiver. So the question
> is: What remnants are we left with when we are
> confronted by texts that show a 'fidelty' to the
> event?  I speak here of 'fidelty' with reference
> with Badiou.  Badiou admits that he is attempting to
> showing fidelis to May68, but wonders whether the
> event has, in a sense, closed, since it lacks a
> name, it is still refered to after all as the event
> of MAY68. I am not sure. One would hope that one is
> able to catch a glimpse of the remnant, a glimpse of
> the remainder, and perhaps this is what we see in
> the works of Deleuze, Guattari, Ranciere, Badiou. It
> seems that in Badiou's work it is precisely the
> subject that is the remnant of the event and this
> seems to work with what I have said about catching a
> glimpse, but what then? This is my problem, as I am
> sure it is for others.  This could however explain
> the seductive quality of certain works but also
> objects and people...the glimpse of the remnant.
> 
> sid
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lucy LeGentilSinge"
> <lucy100millionyearsold at yahoo.co.uk>
> To:
> deleuze-guattari-driftline.org at lists.driftline.org
> Subject: Re: [D-G] Archives
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:24:32 +0000 (GMT)
> 
> > 
> > in my way to mark's post on gravity i peal past
> > chapters and stumbles cross your syd your note on
> May
> > 68
> > it's well and i like the idea of asking
> > how do you about may68 is there a way to grasp an
> > event that (it's a secret may68 i talk ) is it
> still
> > alive or actualised in memories
> > do you know if Deleuze or Foucault they thought
> that
> > the event was kept in the archives, if it was a
> > problem for Foucault to redistribute the evnt,
> like a
> > tiny molecular revolution as 68 or like Pasteur's
> > invention to rabia? is there a way by talking the
> > event can be presented "intact" by the Archiver?
> ---
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow
> Pages
>
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>  

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com