[D-G] to build by help, rhizome

Lucy LeGentilSinge lucy100millionyearsold at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Apr 26 15:29:09 PDT 2005


less meta-discourse? need to rhizome? --- "Dr. Harald
Wenk" <hwenk at web.de> wrote: 
> Hello,
> 
> real good idea. But perhaps not to miuch
> metadiuscorse (n+1).
> 
> greetings
> 
> Harald
> 
> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:50:15 +0100 (BST) schrieb
> Lucy LeGentilSinge  
> <lucy100millionyearsold at yahoo.co.uk>:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -
> > -
> >
> > Merci Liza pour ta lettre d'hier soir. Adline est
> > encore en voyage et elle n'aura probablement pas
> pu
> > répondre à ton courrier.
> >
> > Chèrs Ami,
> > Dear Friends
> > Cara Amigos
> > Chaverim Tovim Sheli
> >
> > Nous, We, Nachnou, Anachnaou
> >
> > --Somebody beep and confirms me the Republic wants
> me
> > to talk in English. I am sure the Afraicans, the
> > Eurasians, and the Micronesisans won't see this as
> a
> > capture of the Drift Line Politics --
> >
> > it's just so I'll do that more easily with my
> friends
> > and not yet seen people subscribed in this place.
> >
> > Yes, the motif the motivation for my talk, for
> today
> > is the one:
> >     Can there be more debate on the list. Can
> > subscriber talk about what they feel worthy of
> > interest, that they would connect or not from
> Deleuze
> > and Guattari . So first 1)
> > Can there be enough people who know of Deleuze and
> > Guattari capable of actively interact does this
> that
> > is there, really making a sense as a relation
> between
> > you and me (i am saying this when the group is not
> yet
> > recognised by anybody else than me), but that I
> can
> > trust we won't get lost out of the maximum of
> benefit
> > we have enjoyed in the past of the list, from the
> two
> > authours, while, as it risqus being diminishing
> now,
> > and the fashion is waning, while the accademician
> feel
> > less concerned about the polemic side of Deleuze
> and
> > Guattari's book, so this world is starting to
> vanish,
> > and I was wondering if we could extend more
> relations
> > between Deleuze and Guattari, and re-ACT to this
> > waning by infusing more relation of Deleuzian
> > Guattari, or that belong to Universes of Value
> with
> > which they share Hyperboreales zones (cad zones of
> > undisctinctions between first nature and second
> > nature) and thus, well, I say this particularily
> to my
> > firend who is a very good supporter to me on this
> > lists when I speak here, Stephano, and I say this
> to
> > you Stephano: I do not care about Ildegirsun
> @yahoo.no
> > being from the North, I am from the South, and we
> need
> > such type of Belongings of that sort if we want to
> > build the rhizome. What is important now the
> rhizome
> > that we want to build here as not yet existed.
> >
> > We want to build a rhizome. The connotation
> explicit,
> > Deleuze ATP Guattari, is less clear: all flyers of
> > popular TV Parties in European American Trendy
> Events
> > are misusing the word rhizome and make some of us
> > "malveillant" malevolent, do you want to be
> > malevolent? no! so we will use it with
> benevolition,
> > the word, rhizome, is there for us, natural,
> immanent.
> >
> >
> > It's strange, I am not sure of the quality. Other
> > matter should be said, they can now find a place
> where
> > here they will be said, and that's what I want to
> do,
> > see if others are likely enthusiast about these
> > possibilities for new, non-deleuzian expression,
> done
> > with admiration for Deleuze. The project is not
> > original of course? And it is. But what is not
> > original is those people who claim a project needs
> to
> > be original. Rhizome!!! What shall we do then,
> only
> > rhizomes?
> >
> > For a while, I should say, until some start to
> > disagree, we will gradually assume democratic
> > decisions for the group according to a vote for
> > changing Rhizome's characteristics.
> >
> > Because we are poet, we have the right to call
> > whatever list on the internet the way it has been
> > designed, Drift, we can for example Drift, we can,
> > call this list: Rhizome.
> >
> > And remember how many readings of Rhizome will not
> be
> > competitive towards a real self-made thought, on
> the
> > rhizome plateau itself.
> >
> > So please, let's Rhizomise.
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends  
> > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> > Info:  
> >
>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> > Archives: www.driftline.org
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul:
> http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>  

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 



More information about the Deleuze-Guattari mailing list