[D-G] explain please

[Keith Appler]

You articulate my sense of it very well.  I've only dabbled in Deleuzian 
theory until very recently.  My background and my wife are dialectically 
materialist, which makes this form of taoism somewhat hard to swallow, 
though less so after Bush's success in the election.

Keith

At 03:07 AM 11/24/2004, you wrote:
>for me, intuitively, i understand line of flight as an escape from an
>oppression of forces.  it can be creating forces, this line.  for
>example, one does not have to actually run away.  like kafka, one can
>transform.  not changing clothes or fashions.  but, finding a style.
>finding ones affections.
>
>in the british school model.  well, deleuze particularly, as i know
>him, as stayed within this main frame sort of schooling, but he
>schizo-analzyed it.  he did not bow to certain authors as gods.  but,
>affirmed what was schizo in them.  looked at things differently than
>main frame platonic visions and he also found marginals was on the
>borders.
>
>not opposing but wading through, like a tick on a branch.
>
>so of your three questions maybe the third problem is most accurate.
>
>i am not that very mature of a thinker but, this is what makes sense to
>me.  i am really illiterate and deleuze is what i am beginning to know.
>  developing a schizo knowledge.
>
>On Nov 23, 2004, at 4:32 PM, Keith Appler wrote:
>
>>Greetings:
>>
>>A line of flight, of course.  Grossberg needs to communicate with
>>colleagues in cultural studies, many of whom subscribe to the "British
>>School" model.  What do you say to such people about a line of flight?
>>  Do you mean that oppositional politics is a line of flight, even if
>>it takes dialectical form, which is not D+G's favorite model of
>>historical development?  Or is this only an affair of the multitude, a
>>statistical mutation toward something unknowable?
>>
>>Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>At 06:05 PM 11/23/2004, you wrote:
>>>line de fuit
>>>
>>>?
>>>
>>>On Nov 23, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Keith Appler wrote:
>>>
>>>>What model do you propose for Deleuzian dissent?  I'm working on
>>>>Grossberg's (We Gotta Get Outta This Place).
>>>>Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At 05:10 PM 11/23/2004, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 05:47:20 -0800, arisensilently at fastmail.fm said:
>>>>> > finally some constructive dissent.
>>>>>----------------
>>>>>dissent never constructive: dissents sucks----------------
>>>>>seee E.Feyderaband PHd Colombia NYC on this issue.lol
>>>>>schizopubnksnotdead!!!yeeyee
>>>>>-------------
>>>>>wooofwof btzzzzzzzzzz-------------blblupblup bisoux tout les jojoes
>>>>>here
>>>>>adline. acertain truth is positivethis list needs positive truth, go
>>>>>on
>>>>>after i cover in the wood.
>>>>>-----------
>>>>>--
>>>>>   adline vanlindenbergh
>>>>>   bisouxnoursfast at fastmail.fm
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>>>>>Admin interface:
>>>>>http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-
>>>>>driftline.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>>>>Admin interface:
>>>>http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari- driftline.org
>>>Ms. Sylvie Ruelle
>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~sylvieruelle
>>>rw_artette_lc at yahoo.com
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>>>Admin interface:
>>>http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari- driftline.org
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>>Admin interface:
>>http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>>
>Ms. Sylvie Ruelle
>http://home.earthlink.net/~sylvieruelle
>rw_artette_lc at yahoo.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>Admin interface: 
>http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org