[D-G] Universe of Reference in Sciences ( the event of Isabelle Stengers? )

Fri May 7 19:37:37 PDT 2021

Hello. Bonjour à tous.

Yes. or there are two sciences, one dark and one light. According to light
science, there are no viruses. There ain't no such thing as
viral contamination. it's a kind of Fungus. You get sick together in a
family cluster for instance, because in your family you don't eat good food,
or there is too much heavy metal getting in your body because you
live close to the computer factories. Light science will tell you: DETOX:
take Zeolite, Zinc, Colloidal Silver, such things offered by Terra-Nature,
not "branded" by Incorporated Capital. . "science" is just a name to
call what is actually dark magic. A tribe of Pre-Adamites coming from
planet Janos/Maldek, affiliated to those from Nibiru,  has had a
descendancy on Terra who mixed with humans. They have for example an
adoration for a dark cult to the negative sixth density Lucifer.
the "esoteric hostage" you talk about,
are humans who have too much black holes (syphoons leading to another
galaxy) in them, and are hypnotized easily by the heavy metal rock
audio-visual industry of the internet medias satellites, they do so
because these humans had lost faith in their life and bodies. The
Pre-Adamites descendents, indeed, noticed a part of the human population
was lost to the true Terra bonanza, instead they were easily manipulatable
by a fake Earth, so this fake Earth, an Artificial Intelligence entity from
outer space, hiddenly governing the Pre-Adamites, managed successfully to
make believe to the "esoteric hostages" that their very own bodies were
recyclable, (a kind of schizophrenia-phylum with no individual holy spirit
bwo), Re-Brids, because not trustworthy, and that this pseudo lack of
quality of Pristine Man - DNA, could be corrected by an "esoteric wisdom",
that is by " dark science":
so, that by taking their dark magic (vaccines and dna alterations), these
hypnotized people are actually offering themselves as
sacrificial population to Moloch.. it is free-will, but,
its noteworthy to be dangerous for the others too, many woman are being
heard complaining when they approach people who have had the "covid"
vaccine, to get these vaginal problems, and be bleeding from their womb...

Mes Cordiales Salutations à tous

Bougre d'âne.

Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 15:46, Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com> a écrit :

>
> Science has made a COVID-19 vaccine without knowing how the virus evolved
> in nature? That’s science? There are at least two COVID-19 populations,
> then. Is one population being held esoteric hostage from us?
>
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Mar, 2021 at 7:39 PM, Bougredâne Bougredandouille <
> bougredane.bougredandouille at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> first:
> HI to All,
>
> Marine, you are probably becoming an idiot, my distressed naughty girl!!
> look on how you now seem confusing again Popper's normativity with
> "demarcationism" :
> Normativity in Sciences is-- for Popper-- the epistemological impossibility
> to reduce Science to Logic
> so much so that the Epistemologist cannot provide the Scientist with ANY
> (eternal) method as to how to "make Science"
> the Epistemologist is reduced to describing Sciences throughout  History,
> the  becoming of truth, the  evolution in Sciences :as in <<Invention des
> sciences modernes>> p57:
> "La science célèbre le franchissement d'un seuil à partir duquel *il est
> impossible de ne pas reconnaître* que l'acteur central de l'évolution
> (est...) le problème objectif,
> habitant du troisième monde"
> Félix Guattari lauded in Chaosmose (1992) Prigogine and Stengers' own
> appeal in "Time and Eternity(1988)"to "new modes" of informally approaching
> Science's description, this because Félix was interested in how "common
> objectivity" in its Historical description is being tested by Science in
> the latter relation to something defying the test of Judgment from the
> Present to the Past, something defying the way the Historian of Science
> would "normally" study Science like the Art historian studies Artists and
> their psychology towards the medium of their times: somehow the history of
> Science is not only the Logic of past events: it relates to Something
> defying the Historian, still insisting in the community of the Present
> Intempestive: something coming from the phenomenal field and which insists
> in the Intempestive contemporaneity of the historian describer.
> the Epistemologist becomes an Historian of Science in that regard, but yet,
> she has to become capable to raise the problem, in a way, she has to become
> a searcher herself, facing something, defying her coming ..
> from the Phenomenal Field:
> actually so Popper is NOT a Normativist, and Isabelle Stengers shows us
> why..
>
> whereas to demarcationism, it is simply meant to tell us how Science when
> it wants to describes itself through a Normative agenda
> and poses itself as "simply" different from non-Science, makes it "only"
> something more valid in some respects to any manny other things, like Art
> or Witchcraft for instance,..
>
> you must not be confusing the two Marine! Normativity and demarcationism
> are two different concepts!
>
> i must leave you now, sorry my naughty girl, i am about to be lurkin'
> around from now, once again, & byebye everyone!
>
> Bougre d'âne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le lun. 8 mars 2021 à 01:11,  Marine DaughterOfthePirate <
> marine.daughter.of.pirate at gmail.com>   a écrit :
>
> > hey Dewey!
> >
> > (sorry for my English!)
> > what interests me most with Isabelle is how
> > the question of politics is tackled:
> > she continuously has referred to an "approche politique" as different to
> > "politics" themselves (and the phenomenal field of opinions in the greek
> > polis)
> > is that not astonishing, once considered her Popperian normative
> > background?
> > she is retired now, but still working at the GECO I have heard?
> > (the historian of Sciences is following the activity of setting the
> > problems by the actors of the " experimental terrain", isn't it?)
> >
> > best,
> > yes, let's talk more often!
> > Marine
> >
> > Le lun. 8 mars 2021 à 00:55, Dewey Dell <dewey.dell5 at gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  hya Johnatan, (and other Brussels' friends & +Spoon DG List junkies..)
> >>
> >> long time not seeing/hearing from you: how are you today actually?
> >>
> >> i am currently studying Isabelle Stengers' <<l' invention des
> >> Sciences Modernes>> written in 1993/1994
> >>
> >> i was at the start abit taken astray by the power of the signifiers in
> >> Popper's 3 Worlds
> >>
> >> now after humour and irony
> >> after a detour by Alan Chalmers (cute dude), Lakatos "program de
> >> recherche"
> >> and Kuhn's incommensurability: between Newton and Einstein,
> >> she now is exploring with more Humour: the event of *Science*, how
> >> scientists
> >> are Repeatedly asking the Event to making "a difference" making it
> >> possible
> >> to validate the question "*Is this Scientific*?"
> >> and how the mise en scène is subjected by the Irony of those
> (relativists)
> >> who want not to see the difference
> >> but favour instead a "Return of the Same" indecisiveness. (in short a
> bit
> >> like Feyeraband they say Science is guilty of a certain cultural vue de
> >> l'esprit, and *That* is ironic she says).
> >>
> >> She describes the advent of Galileo and this turns more and more (in me)
> >> in tune
> >> with the detective novel of Deleuze and Guattari consequences...
> >>
> >> let's keep in touch!
> >>
> >> Dewey xx
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>