[D-G] University program on Brexit and Yellow Jacket (about << multiplicities in rhetoric>>)

Fri Dec 14 11:02:53 PST 2018

Evanescence or withering away of the State: Hardt and Negri would
contend that it did not happen, only a different morphology (Labor of
Dionysus: Critique of State Form). 

The 'social time' mentioned in the Le Monde report exquisitely meshes
with the pathologies of religion, and some of us are not surprised that
its automatons are freaking out as the exodus from fairy tales grows,
and where knowledge replaces the very dangerous infantilism of faith.
The morphology of the rhizomatic itself may be changing.

In "Ousia and Gramme," Derrida pursues the link between the problem of
temporality and the logic of identity by analyzing the treatment of
time in the fourth book of Aristotle's Physics. Aristotle points out
that there would be no time if there were only one single now. Rather,
there must be at least (two [italics]) nows -- "an earlier one before
and a later one after" -- in order for there to be time. Time is thus
defined as succession, however, Aristotle realizes that it contradicts
his concept of identity as (presence in itself [it.]) A self-present,
indivisible now could never even begin to give way to another now,
since what is indivisible cannot be altered. This observation leads
Aristotle to an impasse, since his logic of identity cannot account for
the succession that constitutes time.

Derrida articulates:

'Let us consider the sequence of nows. The preceding now, it is said,
must be destroyed by the following now. But Aristotle then points out,
it cannot be destroyed "in itself" (en beautoi), that is, at the moment
when it is (now, in act). No more can it be destroyed in another now
(en alloi): for then it would not be destroyed as now, itself; and. as
a now which has been, it is....inaccessible to the action of the
following now.'

Hence, as long as one holds on to the idea of an indivisible now -- or
more succinctly: as long as one holds on to the concept of identity as
presence in itself -- it is impossible to think succession....The now
must disappear in its very event....Faced with the relentless division
of temporality, one must subsume time under a nontemporal presence in
order to in order to secure the philosophical logic of identity.'

This is why god is death, as well as an impossibility. This is also
Chekatt's "Allah Akbar," as the religious automaton reels from the
internalized (non-rhizomatic) either-or terror, as a
swastiko-schizmogenetic pinball caught in the crooks of the cross
(fylfot) and violently repelled to the outside as a "once-and-for-all"
act.

<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
>Sent: 12/12/2018 6:32:56 PM
>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>Subject: Re: [D-G] University program on Brexit and Yellow Jacket
(about 
><< multiplicities in rhetoric>>)
>
>hi Ted,
>say there is a way of the rhizomes
>and a way of the arborescence
>different branches of rhizomes, each branch added together creates a
tree
>i think given the rhizome molecular rapidity (given the evanescence of
the
>state in a virilio climax)
>the tree is invisible, which for a (D)eleuzian would say it is
"virtual yet
>real"
>
>this should explain the variation of the parameters like "christian"
>"islam" "islamchristiana"
>"god" "sinn fein" etc
>
>somehow a newspaper like LeMonde which is collecting what aggregates
to the
>opinions
>of potential readers, i see it as a solidification of the molecular
>rapidity with which those rhizomes
>switch branches between the Tree. it collects many amino acids or
>resentments when mistaken for the
>state because of this rigidity in the organization of ideas. it
struggles
>to liberate itself from state rigid structures
>and espouse the molecularity of the variation of opinions between
rhizomes.
>
>Deleuze wanted to distinguish between "power" as "puissance" and power
as
>"pouvoir"
>yet what counts is the potential, "puissance" has a longer range, while
>"pouvoir" breaks up,
>that might explain why Derrida's Tree comes fractured.
>
>so this explains perhaps why sometimes the State is seen as an Evil by
the
>Xmas market lovers,
>which could tell something about them: are they not after all part of
>various rhizomes,
>somehow prefiguring the intersectionism of identity politics? that's
as well
>why i stand for non static blending and becoming between radical
atheists
>and revivalists
>for good schizo-analytic measures.
>
>perhaps Derrida was becoming and changing his ideas alongside his
writing
>process.
>maybe he blended with a revivalist after he met god or death.
>
>so what is left for us to think is how shall LeMonde broadcast what
this
>Newspaper thinks
>of the intersectionist approach, and how the latter shall be thought
by the
>State? will
>it become able to capture it? for Good or Wrong? and what flight lines
will
>answer
>or echo in watching clueless what has happened with the rhizomes
related to
>the automated
>or non automatic brains connected in any whatsoever form to a speeding
>flow(s) of rhizomes
>: thru action-(re)-action, sensori-(motricity) have they (shall
question
>the Yellow Jacket enquirer)
>have these rhizomes been "touched" by the Newspaper broadcast
>structures, or by the Apparatus of Captures of the Evanescent Ghost
Tree?
>is fluidity, gradual malleability (of the
>Apparatus of Capture or State) by NonState-norGovernment-Organizations
and
>equal citizens not part
>of the solution to the Fractured G_D conundrum?
>
>Best,
>J.Pett
>
>Le jeu. 13 déc. 2018 à 00:38, Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com> a
>écrit :
>
>> Johnny Pett,
>>
>> We note that if the state is always already fundamentally terrorist
>> (Apollon, A Lasting Heresy, in Lacan, Politics, Aesthetics) then the
>> antagonism with Islam that you mention here also links with a
>> church-and-state violence. The fact that the Catholics founded the
>> journal, Islamochristiana, in 1975, prompts the question as to what a
>> Yellow Jacket that believes the French government is behind the
recent
>> Strasbourg attack thinks about an Irish link to Brexit?
>>
>> Le Monde: Gerald Bronner: Some Yellow Jackets Believe to See the Hand
>> of the Government Behind the Strasbourg Attacks
>> ;....Le temps social de la mefiance est devenu plus rapide.
>> The social time of mistrust has become faster.'
>>
>> Police Release Image of Cheriff Chekatt
>>
https://coffeeshop88.com/police-release-image-of-christmas-market-attack
>> -suspect/
>> <https://coffeeshop88.com/police-release-image-of-christmas-market-
>attack-suspect/>
>> '....Sinn Fein MEP Martina Anderson, who had just left the market,
told
>> Sky News, "We were walking towards the scene of where the shooting
took
>> place." '
>>
>> Martina Anderson
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martina_Anderson
>> '....in prison for 13 years for IRA activity....'
>>
>> Why does the Xmas market attract so many ex-cons such as Chekatt and
>> Anderson? Has Deleuze covered this in The Philosophy of Crime Novels?
>> Is it a problem of the individual, dividual, or group? (La Borde
>> Clinic, 1966, 'The Group and the Person, Deleuze 'Three Group-Related
>> Problems.'). Radical atheism should never blend for a revival,
because
>> god (is [italics]) death (Derrida).
>>
>> Ed McMahon
>>
>>
>>
>> <-----Original Message----->
>> >From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
>> >Sent: 12/12/2018 1:48:45 PM
>> >To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>> >Subject: Re: [D-G] University program on Brexit and Yellow Jacket
>> (about
>> ><< multiplicities in rhetoric>>)
>> >
>> >i wonder if after WWII Europe gradually chose to avoid the kind of
>> >destruction and exhaustion
>> >of a continent with so much wealth fragmented into thirty nations
and
>> three
>> >or four conglomerates.
>> >
>> >it has gathered into a single block as UE, severed by a few buffer
>> zones
>> >like Moldavia, Bielorussia and Ukrain, from the Russia
>> >
>> >then it collected its energy differently (due) to the Internet
>> >mondialisation.
>> >in 2005 France and Holland voted <<no>> to UE 
>Constitution.
>> >the antagonism with Islam has been defining factor within the rural 
>and
>> >elite opinions since the start of the Millenium.
>> >this was enough for certain elite to organize countries around
issues
>> >related to the given transversal opinions.
>> >so happened Brexit referendum. It was observed how Internets 
>developed
>> >differently in the Anglo-Saxon world,
>> >more united across the Oceans, than a more language centric
Internet,
>> for
>> >example in France. as a result of a language
>> >less spreading and more self-controlled France has a more national
>> culture
>> >Internet. I am sure whatever happens on the personal
>> >level between Theresa May and Donald Trump, if there is Brexit, 
>Britain
>> >future "national interest" stands protected by the USA Cultural
>> Umbrella.
>> >Canada is bi-lingual. But there seems to be a kind of barrier
between
>> the
>> >"globish English" of the european elites, and the alt-light yellow
>> jackets
>> >of the anglo-saxon world. just today it was announced Reuven Rivlin
>> did not
>> >welcome Salvini in Israel. It might be nice indeed if at least 
>between
>> >alt-light yellow jackets
>> >of the european Continent, there was some Common Language, i wonder
>> what
>> >shall keep the Continent together, what shall remain of Europe in a 
>few
>> >years
>> >(next elections in 2019 May) what shall prevent Conflicts to spread
>> between
>> >all these new Nations ? Because there has been a unified Europe, 
>which
>> has
>> >partly modified
>> >the definition of Britain, (hence the difficulty to see clear, also 
>the
>> >difficult choice for Britain to wave good bye to Northern Ireland
>> Unionists)
>> >I wonder if the antagonism with Islam will be enough to prevent
>> Conflicts
>> >between Nations in Europe? Maybe with the social faith, the pro-
>migrant
>> >will forget atheism and blend with
>> >the alt-light in a religious revival? Yet the Centers of the
european
>> >civilisation, like Paris, London, Marseilles, Leuven or Amsterdam 
>etc,
>> have
>> >developed
>> >in reason of the creation of Universities, of the flourishing of the
>> >intellect and the arts. If they don't want to precisely fall in the 
>bad
>> >habits which doomed the Islamic
>> >culture since Avicenna, Averroes knowledge went to the North via 
>Dante,
>> >Tomas Aquinas etc. If they don't want to be doomed the Centers must
>> remain
>> >liberal, egalitarian.
>> >I think it's high time they demand a reformed Islam, that they 
>actually
>> >help themselves with insight into standing up on the Cities level,
to
>> the
>> >egalitarian assistance
>> >to those of Muslim faith to adapt their culture to the XXI century.
>> That's
>> >why I don't think it is enough of Trump or Putin to be friend with
>> Mohamed
>> >bin Salman.
>> >Europe ought to consider, in case it closes its border with the 
>South,
>> to
>> >let them open to those in the South who show a will to reform their
>> culture
>> >in a libertarian
>> >and egalitarian modern society. It will be vital if they ex-UE want 
>to
>> >remain in the Center of affairs, because that's part of the idea i
>> guess.
>> >Now, besides for the article in townhall that you mention, it is
>> perfectly
>> >possible, and many British citizen live now in the South of France.
>> >
>> >JP
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 19:30, Mike Lansing 
><badger2 at mail2world.com> a
>> >écrit :
>> >
>> >> Dead List News 12 Dec 2018
>> >>
>> >> 10 Dec 2018 Americans, Learn from the Yellow Jackets: Stop 
>Running
>> and
>> >> Start Fighting Back
>> >>
>>
https://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2018/12/10/americans-learn
>> >> -from-the-yellowjackets-stop-running-and-start-fighting-back-
>n2537215
>> >> 
><https://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2018/12/10/americans-
>> >learn-from-the-yellowjackets-stop-running-and-start-fighting-back-
>n2537
>> 215>
>> >>
>> >> 17 Jan 2017 Slavoj Zizek on Trump and Brexit -- BBC News
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZUCemb2plE
>> >>
>> >> 12 Dec 2018 Theresa May: Change in Leadership Could Delay Brexit
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fap9M9rE8Lw
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>> >Info:
>>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>> >Archives: www.driftline.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>> Info:
>>
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>> Archives: www.driftline.org
>>
>_______________________________________________
>List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
>Info:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>Archives: www.driftline.org 