[D-G] University program on Brexit and Yellow Jacket (about << multiplicities in rhetoric>>)

[Johnatan Petterson]

Hi Mike.

I am sorry. The List is Dead.
Besides I am working on a Novel wherein I could integrate DeleuzeGuattari
stuffs.
And a movie, I said it before.
I had hopes for opensource Blender. I have some hope in 3D, how building in
3D and 2D within Augmented Reality
etc could help people build something instead of going to the shrink or to
uni.
Instead Blender pretends it is open source, but like the false pledges of
Macron, there is an abyss coming up.
I see loads of Zombis and not enough Androids.
The Androids are connected to the Center of the Galaxy.
The Zombi work for Google, Macron.
They are off set. Yet they MUST work HARD.
This is the way the world seem set to be, towards pronto apocalyps.
We have to wait for a nuclear war between the West and Russia and Iran.
Loads of unnecessary problems. Sorry see ya around.

Johhnnny !



Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 23:42, Mike Lansing <badger2 at mail2world.com> a
écrit :

> We are interested in D&G concepts if this list is still active. UK's
> desired sovereignty is problematic and might be viewed through a
> Derridean lens. The narcissicists of petroleum addiction seem to always
> outnumber Zola's train riders.
>
> <-----Original Message----->
> >From: Johnatan Petterson [internet.petterson at gmail.com]
> >Sent: 12/9/2018 5:39:12 AM
> >To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> >Subject: Re: [D-G] University program on Brexit and Yellow Jacket
> (about
> ><< multiplicities in rhetoric>>)
> >
> >Dear Deleuzo-Guattary attendants,
> >
> >I thought to forward this from a friend on nettime mailing-list
> >
> >Marine, She is the daughter of a famous Pirate (Capitaine Crochet is
> his
> >public name)
> >
> > I send it to you because it's part of an University inter-university
> >program
> >where application of the Deleuze & Guattari concepts are executed in
> >Politcal rhetoric:
> >part of an Inactual Intervention on the topic of Brexit, Western
> Politics,
> >and Yellow Jackets,
> >
> >here the key concepts (imposed subject) were:
> >
> ><<disjunctive synthesis<<, <<opinion as solid<<,
> ><<Cartesian doubt
> >method<<, <<multiplicity versus ONE<<, and
> ><<incarnation of ONE<<
> >
> >I hope Marine Crochet sturdy ideas, to stir pronto some more debate on
> your
> >DG list...
> >
> >Multi-Bacci a tutti !!
> >
> >Johnny Pett
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Dear List,
> >>>
> >>> I am living in a French environment, even though not in France.
> >>>
> >>> that's the historic of my opinions:
> >>>
> >>> 1) first I thought it was the wrong idea to go on strike against
> the
> >oil
> >>> taxes when the "Bonnets Rouges" also
> >>> stroke against a similar eco friendly tax on traffic, back in the
> >>> Segolene Royal Hollande years.
> >>>
> >>> 2) but then, i got to see the Tikkun Bloom related Lundi Matin
> hebdo,
> >who
> >>> was trying to demonstrate how Yellow Jackets
> >>> make dysfunction the "dysfunctions" (ie the States Apparatus one)
> and
> >>> explaining how important it was to change your habits
> >>> according to "Yellow Jackets" way of demonstrations.
> >>>
> >>> 3) now i think Macron will listen, and his Government shall listen
> to
> >the
> >>> constrains on the infrastructure change Yellow Jackets
> >>> demand, like the one on re-nationalization of La Poste and SNCF
> >(Trains).
> >>> It is totally compatible to his ideas on giving Fibre Optique (ADSL)
> >>> to every one in France, however remote you are from big towns.
> Yellow
> >>> Jackets indeed agree to the eco friendliness, and opt for more
> train
> >lines
> >>> being
> >>> constructed.
> >>>
> >>> Besides I believe the French Government is stuck, because Macron
> >wants
> >>> more of an European semi International or say "Democrats" (in the us
> >>> politics use of the word)
> >>> plastic "globalism", which he understands to go alongside his way to
> >>> decipher what "French Universalism" stands for (cfr previous UN
> >assembly
> >>> discourse by Macron, where he
> >>> paused as a Trump critic.)
> >>>
> >>> And perhaps its a chance for him to show how versatile can be his
> >>> spirits. And adopt a deeper way of changing France infrastructure.
> >Deeper,
> >>> of course, in this sense
> >>> that it is democratic, egalitarian, and that people's desire are
> >taken
> >>> into account in the more extended way as possible, even so more
> >assuredly
> >>> when they themselves
> >>> try to show responsibility and show restrain towards the violence
> >this
> >>> last Saturday, a bit like Toni Negri & Hardt, in the end of
> >Multitudes.
> >>>
> >>> Now, I think Britain needs to have someone who in charge of
> Politics,
> >can
> >>> combine in her or his reasoning the different factors of the
> >questions of a
> >>> very fractured opinions on the issue of Brexit.
> >>> I think mostly this shall encompass keeping the argument of working
> >"in
> >>> the nations interest".
> >>> So that the interest of the "nation of Britain", is that some
> >agreement
> >>> between the Leave feeling and the Remain feeling gets rightly
> >assorted, so
> >>> that Britain can effectively
> >>> answer to the majority of the first referendum call, and at the same
> >>> moment become able to allow "Britain" as a Sovereign Person, to be
> >able to
> >>> talk about Herself or Himself as
> >>> someone not Fractured. That is accepting the disjunctive synthesis
> of
> >>> Being Fractured (as it is shown above to be between various desires
> >and
> >>> opinions), and being ONE.
> >>>
> >>> May be for you who pay attention to the Marxist discourse cases of
> >entry
> >>> in the logs of discourse, such a disjunctive synthesis may sound
> >uncanny.
> >>>
> >>> Yet, I believe Politics is too much looked at from the angle of the
> >non
> >>> practical in this nettime group. Too often have I been led astray
> >reading
> >>> drifting theoretical quasi rhetorical discussions
> >>> which will never help any whatsoever change in the world affairs.
> >Not, I
> >>> guess, even weigh in on the most advanced avant-garde leftist
> >political
> >>> force there is, if not
> >>> just to add a little on the resentment which is only part of the
> >>> theoretical neurons in your many brains.
> >>>
> >>> Britain must be understood by someone, in the elected crowd of
> >people,
> >>> (is by the way this Theresa May still part of the elected body?) i
> >mean
> >>> Britain must be understood
> >>> and explained to the whole nation, by the same single one individual
> >>> elected human character, in one single intellectual & political
> >movement,
> >>> it must be understood, and explained.
> >>>
> >>> If there is not such a person currently in Britain, then, we will
> >have
> >>> trouble.
> >>>
> >>> This might certainly sound like a call to reflexion, on the notion
> >of
> >>> "multiplicity" and it is not a call to strong leadership (of
> course)
> >it is
> >>> a call to
> >>> letting something sensible, go transparent, through the situation,
> >which
> >>> is too complex to be understood at this moment, for
> >>> lack of conceptual quality in the reflexion groups and "think
> tanks"
> >such
> >>> as nettime or elsewhere.
> >>>
> >>> People on the net instead of discussing their opinions, should try
> to
> >>> change the tools with which they understand the current and recent
> >becoming
> >>> of this world.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps, the scientific community, the one who obeys the doctrine of
> >>> "doubt" (and NOT opinions which are too solid) is perhaps more
> >naturally
> >>> elected to see through this situation,
> >>> than the opinion class which is ruling over the debates and over the
> >>> Governments of UE or US since a few twenty or so years.
> >>> This, i get a feeling that Donald Trump had understood, yet,
> >>> unfortunately for everybody his actual somewhat sick limited
> >behavior, do
> >>> not stand as the leader, for the solving the problems of his time.
> >>>
> >>> So maybe we hope Macron will understand how to reconsider his own
> >very
> >>> Philosophy and its very Foundations.
> >>> And listen to the change(s) asked by the multiplicity of his
> >electorates.
> >>> And propose a set of public discussion in a way which
> >>> would not necessarily destroy everything in France in UE or on
> Earth.
> >He
> >>> can invent, he's got a lot of tools with the digital.
> >>> Maybe perhaps as well listen to the nettime opinion and create new
> >>> alternative (to Twitter and Facebook etc) for just the sake of this
> >public
> >>> discussion to be set straight, about and on topic the exact right
> >decisions
> >>> to accomplish, which will be passed by him Macron, or the next
> >successor
> >>> in Government(s).
> >>>
> >>> Best in heart,
> >>> Marine, daughter of a pirate.
> >>>
> >>>
> >_______________________________________________
> >List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> >Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> >Archives: www.driftline.org
> >.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Info:
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
>