[D-G] Deleuze-Guattari Digest, Vol 63, Issue 3
hwenk at web.de
Mon May 10 09:51:09 PDT 2010
I am aware of the "hypnotic" and automatizing effect
of images in general, in spite Deleuze wrote a two volume book on
cinema. CGI are used in films nowadays. The last very succesful is the
But of course, the inspiration of liteates or ontology itself or "the earth"
are much more impressing and making alive.
The "no image of god" law in chritinity and islam, ther going to no image at
all, maybe some hint to it.
The esotaric foramalizations and expressions are indeed there from the
of the human strata, "technics" and the complex scholar languages (Sanskrit,
babylonoan, Pali, etc)
and a lot of ccontent from the "colorful picture of all, what had been
believed" (Nietzsche + D&G), and a lot of jargons orginates from it.
The questipn of religion, earth , terrotiy and ritornell are very complex.
At the moment i am absorbed in this question by Spinozas view of
taken up by D&G.
The "atuning" to the earth, not only passive but also active
is very very inteseting, waves or something else.
The link to Eliade is also present in his integral view of religion view
from Schamanism to Yoga.
The tackling of the question of eternal life is a key one, which is
formulated in yoga
(the last root of suffering is fear of death, which causes ignorance).
This is the another formulation of spinozas esence by instinct
at least human.
Schamansim is obsessed of eternal soul question, as far as I remember.
PS: I like some prolifaration, which in case of creative "ideas" is
--------------------------------------------------If you are afan of
literates, the "hugework of Lovecraft" with his
From: <deleuze-guattari-request at lists.driftline.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 10:02 PM
To: <deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org>
Subject: Deleuze-Guattari Digest, Vol 63, Issue 3
> Send Deleuze-Guattari mailing list submissions to
> deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> deleuze-guattari-request at lists.driftline.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> deleuze-guattari-owner at lists.driftline.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Deleuze-Guattari digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Re: machines/territories (Mas Que Palabras)
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 19:42:04 +0200
> From: Mas Que Palabras <xavier.buades at gmail.com>
> To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
> Subject: Re: [D-G] machines/territories
> <AANLkTinXHutOfx5WYZPo9chg4Nwp5Tgfa2HpQef4QqIf at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Harald wrote :
> As the computers in production are wholly in the hand of the capitalists,
> from their point of view, their possibiltity to "play" with the neccesity
> the present workers and the
> times of production and the possibilities of their substitution are very
> As programs are even more "esoteric", not or very seldom public discussed
> and if very fruitless, the "dangerous" intellutcual work is banned from
> direct production to a very large
> Therefore, intellectual work is very much pulled to media and to politics.
> But here, we have the calamity, that question of power are more and more
> decided by property of money or dedictaed to
> the power of directing the property of money.
> Dear Harald,
> Thank you for answering the problem set by my three days ago posting.
> It was indeed automated formating which -- in my vision of the thing --
> explains something about alienation of work and workers.
> All the sadness and uglyness going with it along.
> At the same time, what you hint to be as this Esoteric Hidden Monster was
> all yet present since say the days human strata (tools and signs) came to
> the surface
> into its birth, existence?
> It seems often mental/physical difficulty to address the esoteric issue
> could be resolved, one day, in "making the step", "faire un pas" as said
> a photographer once visionary into XXcentury ( a friend of Gherasim Lucca)
> CGI are not a bliss, my problem is that it serves nearly to 100percent in
> accademical art
> mentality, the later which, to my opinion is not derived from the Universe
> of art itself,
> but from (could I say?) some philosophy, or at least reasoning?
> and that the CGisters take their bliss for what in humble vision of me is
> repetitive cliche
> and boredom in automated visions. & there of course comes the opportunity
> to regulate the codes and the frustrations
> when the addressing of the issue, to quote you say, is "ignored"
> it might be due to the fact that you are
> addressing the issue of power of some daimoniac entity
> that rules with Envy the thoughts of Innocent Mankind.
> There's another ring thing. In Refrain (Ritournelle)
> a part from the fact that
> i would enjoy the PAGE (x) wherein there's reference
> to religion enlarged and explained to me (cfr. birds as forces of the air
> and fishes as forces of the salted waters) in Mircea Eliade (Treaty of
> History of Religions)
> with the Earth being in the center of the territory
> aswell as being meanwhile far, far away (and yet finding nothing alas of
> this in M Eliades book)
> from it, i think it would
> be interesting to seek
> this issue of automatism and alienation from
> the point of view of territory.
> but i think i might cannot do it here,
> i need to construct it bits by bits,
> with visions and sounds
> i am not sure if reading,
> if carry on reading Empire will lead me somewhere.
> thanks for your full answer anywhere
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Archives: www.driftline.org
> End of Deleuze-Guattari Digest, Vol 63, Issue 3
More information about the Deleuze-Guattari