[D-G] Deleuze-Guattari Digest, Vol 66, Issue 2

[Harald Wenk]

Dear charles,


I am aware of the fact, that the superriches in US tend to live
in own suburbs, which are to expensive for anyone else most even to visit them.



Nonetheless I like to mention, that in the antioedipe a real 
opposition of a schiziod-revolutionry pole and a fascist-paranoid one 
as a real
qualitative difference ist posed ( Second positive task. Fourth 
thesis: The two poles of the
libido occupation of the social field. near the end of the book).

So, the construction of a fascist-schizo flux is
not possible or like a round square.


As there is no preparation for your email, nor any introduction this bold
misuse of notions, direct aganinst the definitions and things of 
heart of the anti-oedipe makes me more than suspicious,
if you are really a contribuer to a fruitful discusssion in
the sense of liberation of happinbess in the sense of D&G.



Second, the deterrotialization of capiltalism is
connected to a double retorrotilalization to the state with overdetermination
and to the body of the money. Therefore it is only
decoding and not really schiziod.

As everyone knows, both money and the state tend to repression.

There are often disturbances in this list.



greetings Dr. rer. Nat. Harald Wenk

--------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
>From: charles hubaker <solntsepyati at yahoo.com>
>To: deleuze-guattari at lists.driftline.org
>Subject: [D-G] An Unmoderated Discussion List
>Message-ID: <173437.63017.qm at web52606.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>An unmoderated discussion list would serve to eliminate the glossing 
>over of the
>three-dimensional problem, which has been manifest on this list in 
>the past. The
>problem is defined as that which the moderator cannot know about the poster of
>the message sent to this list. It's not a little matter, because 
>some of us have
>seen the slowly operating sanctions inside the American rhizome:
>deterritorializations are taking on new forms.
>
>An example is the fencing-in of construction sites in the U.S. Not many were
>paying attention, because this practice had already been part and 
>parcel of the
>American West. East of the Mississippi, however, this practice only began in
>intensity within the last decade. Therefore, capitalism and communism have at
>least this in common: the ground under one's feet is being reified 
>as it relates
>to the State. This would imply the concept of it being 'only support for the
>nomad,' as per D&G. But to admit one already has an email account 
>just to obtain
>another one places the scapegoat-victim in the sights of fascism....a schizoid
>fascism: you the desirer of email did it to yourself, so the fascist cannot be
>blamed.
>
>
>Now, fascist forces are taking advantage of this compromised schiz-flux and
>applying new rules: one cannot have an email acount without first 
>already having
>(another[italics]) email account. That is to say, the two email accounts the
>victim had before is being split so that emails bounce. The Cyberspace?Pimp
>first got the masses addicted, and now they dance their victims like
>marionettes, because the split makes all the difference when emails start to
>bounce. The Pimp is now playing with the puppets in this way: by causing the
>alternate email to bounce. A very special delirium.
>