[D-G] mona has
stuart tait
enso at postmark.net
Tue Jan 18 03:40:08 PST 2005
hey.
i tried to say the same thing a few months back and got the same old
string of semicoherent slippages. verlainelefou is right, reference to
texts and discussion isn't a capitalist/oppressor conspiracy... there
is a time to encode and a time to decipher, a time to sit down and do
sums and a time to pull the gnarly black lump from your soul. If we do
one without the other we run the risk of fleeing from constraint right
into a rather constraining paranoia which i'm sure D&G would have
thought just stupid.
Freeing your own mind is a laudible aim, but you should think about
coming back to the market place with bare feet and a smile on your
face now that the OX has obviously disappeared!
stuart tait
enso at postmark.net
James Depew wrote:
> Still trying to fill the mustard pot? I say break it OPEN.
>
> Shouts and screams will never match that void. Nor will desires.
> Only one desire pushes at the limits. Don't try to find it, it will
> find you. The priest of repression you say? Perhaps. We have to
> find the darkness before making it empty. A little song that is sung
> in the dark forest will soon open on to a prismatic spray, covering
> everything. Just a single tiny note to build a symphony of colourful
> discord.
>
> Dont't try to harmonize. Don't worry about me, I'm not you. The
> darkness is no OTHER. Only infinite space counting down to zero,
> impossibly. The ten thousand rhythms will never be enough.
>
> Remember: without the freed slave shouting at you from the outside,
> you would only do what you're told.
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:30:25 +0000 (GMT), verlainelefou at yahoo.com
> <verlainelefou at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dearest Forest in the east is the priestof repression sounds like she got
yer number and its like finding the
> >
> > voice in deleuze sans guattari c'est n'est pas possible.
> >
> > Its all a creation and a becomings.
> >
> > Dada
> >
> > So this is the second deleuze-guattari list that I have joined just
intime to see it fall apart? Not enough for a pattern...not yet atleast.
Does anyone have a point? I have had poems sent to my inbox,which are
interesting and could stimulate discussion; I have had someincoherent
free-association pass my way, which also could beinteresting; besides that,
mostly banter, oh, and someone asking foretexts. Do I have this straight?
People are criticizing someone forasking for texts? Under the pretext that it
is some sort ofhierarchically driven authority loving captialist request?
What???? Am I missing something? (quite possible since I have only
justarrived) Is it: promote creative conceptualisation but let's not readthe
books that inspired that idea because they have come to representthe
functioning of an overcoding regime? Those of you criticizing:you have read
Deleuze and Guattari, right? Or did the ideas manifestin your head
spontaneously?Now that would be
> > intersting...foris
> >
> >
> > all my words are on parole
> >
> > http://fictionsofdeleuzeandguattari.blogspot.com/
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
> > _______________________________________________
> > List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> > Admin interface:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Admin interface:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
More information about the Deleuze-Guattari
mailing list