[D-G] Don't explain deleuze please

[Sylvie Ruelle]

i like your uses of English
so poetic

On Nov 24, 2004, at 6:33 PM, adline vanlindenbergh wrote:

> dg has been published and everybody can read it. copyes are circulating
> on Niger river, on Amour River.. schizoline wanderrer across 
> continents,
> have read dg and it did some good to them or NOT. lot's of questions 
> and
> all time i wrote on dg spoon older list, it was i said the books like
> what is philo has been published, and if even if the politic in this
> book is very international, very futuristic, maybe only litterally it's
> in an elite a becoming elite of ten singular (readers) who LOVE DESIRE
> from the book. who use the book, and do not want to speak for it, to
> explain away the written text. but what to act, produce something, to
> deterritorialise (absoluteively) from it. becoming philosophy is one of
> the objective set in this book.
>
> to me in that sense i had already fully agreed with guattari talking
> about alternative subjectivity (alt.to for example occidental 
> mainstream
> subjectivity )Universes Complexities will need ARTS more than
> Philosophy. no need of philosophy books, read dg for philosophy, read
> spinoza. the rest is disgusting. all the zyek badiou negri etc : no
> sense, good but non-sense. we don't need intellectuals, we need
> philosopher to become artists.
>
> dismantling the usa can be a political idea, and surely lot's of people
> are already thinking about how to ashieve this. but only artist can
> dismantle the usa, and the rest of the world. it's not only usa which
> needs to be thought differently, it's the whole planet. only artists
> have the solitude required for thinking and constructing a new earth.
> it's a bifurcation from the intelletgentsia of what lies since
> rennaissance which has to take break from the past. it means terrible
> suffering, of which hunger is one of the slightest harm. (packs lines
> turning to line of death, etc)try not be populist if you are honnest
> about doing "good", or producing active affactios; because this is not
> thinking to be a stone or a car or a factory: they are thinking objects
> themselves.. what states man does not crave for this little thing: to 
> be
> a thinker. what is needed is the virtual to come on the earth, and 
> this,
> what is the virtual, and how can it become arrive on earth, is the task
> of the thinker/ARTIST, only. the rest is paranoia, clubs networks, 
> squid
> life. unhook from life and become a self that exists in the infinite
> worlds, so you can start to think with desire (feelings). so go to your
> typewriter and right a model.
> -- 
>   adline vanlindenbergh
>   bisouxnoursfast at fastmail.fm
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: deleuze-guattari at driftline.org
> Admin interface: 
> http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
>
>
Ms. Sylvie Ruelle
http://home.earthlink.net/~sylvieruelle
rw_artette_lc at yahoo.com